Improvements in Perovskite Solar Cell Database Schema
Currently, there are certain things that need to be improved in the Perovskite Database Schema. We need:
-
Add descriptions to sections, in particular to the root section stating that the descriptions of the quantities are the original ones from the Perovskite Database to provide the context on how this data was curated. -
Improve the MD style in some descriptions. Particularly change the bullet points to "-" to render them properly in the GUI. -
Check that the results section gets populated properly. Correct writing perovskite
intoarchive.results.material.material_name
. @himanel1 is there a place inresults.material
where I could annotate that is possibly a perovskite-type structure, regardless of cubic, tetragonal or monoclinic? -
Change the results.properties.optoelectronic.band_gap
toresults.properties.optoelectronic.band_gap_optical
section. Keep it as a repeating section-
Update the bandgap writing to band_gap_optical instead in ELN base sections and in Perovskite Database schema
-
In general, it would be great if you @himanel1 and @mscheidg could click around the perovskite solar cell entries and with your knowledge of the software and metainfo check if there are some points to make it better. This is with the perspective of the Solar Cell tutorial series in December but maybe also for a paper. I leave a link here Perovskite Database Staging