- May 24, 2017
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
I want to properly accomodate postprocessing codes, so I need something more general than `direct_numerical_simulation`.
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
doesn't do anything for now
-
-
- May 23, 2017
-
-
Add a sampling method -- update to be generic against the field -- need to update NSVEparticles::do_stats
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
- May 22, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
-
- May 19, 2017
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- May 15, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
for scaling tests, if we don't want to get stuck on I/O things...
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- May 14, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
keep NSVEparticles, since it's a child of NSVE and everything is more consistent this way
-
- May 08, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
-
- May 03, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Berenger Bramas authored
Update particles output to limite the number of processes involved -- manage a minimum chunk size -- write a multiple of a chunk
-
- Apr 08, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
also fix a typo in the vorticity equation wrapper, but the code fails anyway, so that's not a big deal. I still need to generate initial conditions.
-
- Apr 07, 2017
-
-
Chichi Lalescu authored
-
- Feb 21, 2017
-
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- Feb 09, 2017
-
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- Jan 18, 2017
-
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- Oct 16, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
- Oct 05, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
I doubt that it does anything useful, but it compiles.
-
- Sep 16, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
found https://seasonofcode.com/posts/how-to-add-custom-build-steps-and-commands-to-setuppy.html and used it to clean up the compiling step.
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
USE_TIMINGOUTPUT should be controlled from setup.py. In this commit, I'm trying something elegant that's supposed to work, but the "build" command actually fails for some reason. Hence the commit, and I need to fix it in future commits.
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- Sep 14, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
the idea is to modify the fluid_solver class into something that uses the field class, to the point where if we want to change the backend to something other than plain FFTW, the new solver class will not need to be modified in any way. the "vorticity_equation" class included in this commit is not functional, it is only a checkpoint.
-
Berenger Bramas authored
-
- Aug 15, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
however, the error and output files are not in the correct location...
-
- Aug 13, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
- May 14, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
at this point it makes sense, since version 2 is a lot closer now. and version 2 will work with different input files...
-
- May 09, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
-
- Apr 26, 2016
-
-
Cristian Lalescu authored
code compiles, but doesn't do anything yet...
-