Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • N NIFTy
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 19
    • Issues 19
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 12
    • Merge requests 12
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • ift
  • NIFTy
  • Merge requests
  • !306

Generalize do_adjust_variances

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Philipp Arras requested to merge adjust_variances into NIFTy_5 Mar 14, 2019
  • Overview 4
  • Commits 2
  • Pipelines 2
  • Changes 1

The adjust variances function is unnecessarily specific at the moment. This is now generalized to the case d=A*xi where xi is an apriori white Gaussian random field and A is a general operator.

Do we want to do some renamings? Is there perhaps a better name than do_adjust_variances?

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: adjust_variances