Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • N NIFTy
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 18
    • Issues 18
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 15
    • Merge requests 15
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

On Thursday, 2nd February from 9 to 10.00 am there will be a maintenance with a short downtime of the GitLab service.

  • ift
  • NIFTy
  • Merge requests
  • !290

WIP: added a value linearization consistency check

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Closed Reimar H Leike requested to merge improving_consistency_checks into NIFTy_5 Feb 05, 2019
  • Overview 5
  • Commits 5
  • Pipelines 5
  • Changes 1

Added a test that checks wether an operator yields the same result if called with Linearization or without (different code might be called in either case). Would be ready to merge, however one could extend the tests, e.g. make one check that checks all the linear consistency checks if it is called with a linear operator and checks all the gradient and nonlinear consistency as well as the linear consistency for the jacobian when called with an Operator. That way we could unify the consistency checks and gain more coverage.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: improving_consistency_checks