diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle-to-tei.ipynb b/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle-to-tei.ipynb
index 6e5df2fa057af661d4a5aee3135cae6936c21d36..df8ddf734063483bfaa70ccce5333d689398ac22 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle-to-tei.ipynb
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle-to-tei.ipynb
@@ -373,8 +373,8 @@
{
"metadata": {
"ExecuteTime": {
- "end_time": "2024-10-02T17:20:50.427313Z",
- "start_time": "2024-10-02T17:20:50.054271Z"
+ "end_time": "2024-10-03T05:43:54.358391Z",
+ "start_time": "2024-10-03T05:43:54.097800Z"
}
},
"cell_type": "code",
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
]
}
],
- "execution_count": 1
+ "execution_count": 7
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@
{
"metadata": {
"ExecuteTime": {
- "end_time": "2024-10-02T17:43:46.257357Z",
- "start_time": "2024-10-02T17:43:45.813460Z"
+ "end_time": "2024-10-03T05:45:50.421260Z",
+ "start_time": "2024-10-03T05:45:49.898846Z"
}
},
"cell_type": "code",
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@
"output_type": "display_data"
}
],
- "execution_count": 1
+ "execution_count": 10
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml b/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
index 2041c7d3436b8088eb72f605646e5bda20155be3..0e6dfc4629c82ea0754ac5db3fbfeeee8a6c843a 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/anystyle/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
@@ -613,7 +613,6 @@
<author>Däubler</author>
<backref>(oben N. 32)</backref>
<pages>33. </pages>
- <ignore>Rechtsvergleicbung und vergleichende Recbtssoxiologie 79</ignore>
</sequence>
<sequence>
<citation-number>56</citation-number>
@@ -720,7 +719,6 @@
<volume>5</volume>
<date>(1978)</date>
<pages>109 ff. </pages>
- <ignore>Rechtsvergleichung und vergleichende Rechtssoziologie 81</ignore>
</sequence>
<sequence>
<citation-number>65</citation-number>
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/lib/convert.py b/convert-anystyle-data/lib/convert.py
index fc4ff7279cb57559e76e28cba0d7e31352e94c3d..76b31cc38e533d27dd6720a5d10ea07358974f21 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/lib/convert.py
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/lib/convert.py
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ def split_creators(text: str, bibl, tag, clean_func, preserve):
attr = None
name_part_element = add_node(pers_name, tag, name, attr)
# re-attach trailing comma to surname if original text had it
- if tag == 'surname':
+ if tag == 'surname' and n != names_list[-1]:
if f'{name},' in text:
name_part_element.tail = ','
@@ -317,6 +317,8 @@ def anystyle_to_tei(input_xml_path, id, preserve=False):
add_node(bibl, 'idno', text, {'type': 'caseNumber'}, clean_func=remove_punctuation,
preserve=preserve)
case 'pages':
+ # todo: if we have "ff." or "seqq.", it is most probably a citedRange rather than a biblScope
+ # also, when pages follow book metadata such as publisher or location
if bibl[-1].tag == "ref":
handle_pages(text, bibl, 'citedRange', preserve=preserve)
else:
@@ -340,6 +342,13 @@ def anystyle_to_tei(input_xml_path, id, preserve=False):
if issue:
add_node(bibl, 'biblScope', issue, clean_func=clean_issue, preserve=preserve)
+ # add trailing period if missing
+ if bibl[-1].tail is None:
+ bibl[-1].tail=''
+ if sequence[-1].text.endswith('.') and not bibl[-1].tail.endswith('.'):
+ bibl[-1].tail += '.'
+
+
# convert to lxml
tei_root_str = ET.tostring(tei_root, encoding='unicode')
lxml_root = etree.fromstring(tei_root_str)
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/lib/string.py b/convert-anystyle-data/lib/string.py
index 15550bcb281d5ed726d7b07da3bf236a1a58481e..1621106a5fd3d82305fe5b3469aec6060af1072c 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/lib/string.py
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/lib/string.py
@@ -84,7 +84,10 @@ def compare_input_strings(tei_dir_path, ref_dir_path, html_output_path, target_u
w.write("\n".join(tei_input_data))
# create files showing the diff between the reconstructed and the original raw strings
- html_diff = HtmlDiff().make_file(anystyle_input_data, tei_input_data)
+ html_diff = HtmlDiff().make_file(fromlines=anystyle_input_data,
+ tolines=tei_input_data,
+ fromdesc=anystyle_input_path,
+ todesc=tei_bibl_path)
# store the visual diff
with open(f"{html_output_path}/{id}.diff.html", "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt b/convert-anystyle-data/refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt
index 57547aabbfead1df66de00c2fb107497b6f84296..55404a272e03a91fc11ff9701ae843b13c5a56f3 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research -
10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.
11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18). Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.
12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.
-13 Smelser 2 f. ; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.). - Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).
+13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.). - Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).
14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl, 1969) 514 (520 ff.). — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.
15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.).
16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research -
52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.
53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.
54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.
-55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33. Rechtsvergleicbung und vergleichende Recbtssoxiologie 79
+55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.
56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.
57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders., The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.
58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
index 030e791775501ccdd051f94a478710ef17210bb8..c89236ab7939274a9a5e9b5b6cb9eb0381cf8a02 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
<text>
<body>
<p>The article text is not part of this document</p>
- <listBibl>
+ <listBibl type="inText">
<bibl>
<seg type="comment">Abgekürzt werden zitiert</seg>
:
@@ -25,12 +25,13 @@
<surname>Armer</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Grimshaw</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies</title>
(
<pubPlace>New York, London, Sydney, Tokio</pubPlace>
@@ -43,12 +44,13 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Rebbinder</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung</title>
(
<date>1977</date>
@@ -60,8 +62,8 @@
<surname>Rokkan</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
- <title level="m">Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations</title>
+ (Hrsg.),
+ <title level="m">Comparative Research Across Cultures and Nations</title>
(
<pubPlace>Paris, Den Haag</pubPlace>
<date>1968</date>
@@ -73,22 +75,25 @@
<surname>Rokkan</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Verba</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Viet</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Almasy</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Comparative Sutvey Analysis</title>
(
<pubPlace>Den Haag, Paris</pubPlace>
@@ -99,7 +104,6 @@
<surname>Smelser</surname>
</persName>
</author>
-
<title level="m">Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences</title>
</bibl>
<bibl>
@@ -121,12 +125,13 @@
<surname>Szalai</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Petrella</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Cross National Comparative Survey Research</title>
(
<pubPlace>Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt</pubPlace>
@@ -139,7 +144,7 @@
<surname>Vallier</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Comparative Methods in Sociology</title>
(
<pubPlace>Berkeley, Los Angeles, London</pubPlace>
@@ -150,6 +155,7 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kötz</surname>
@@ -157,8 +163,7 @@
</author>
.
<title level="m">Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung</title>
- Bd.
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">Bd. I</biblScope>
(
<date>1971</date>
).
@@ -172,14 +177,15 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kötz</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="12">12</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="12">12 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="2" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -216,8 +222,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="3">3</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">3</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="3" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -228,6 +234,7 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Rehbinder</surname>
@@ -243,7 +250,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Abel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -255,8 +261,8 @@
(
<date>1973</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="174">174 ff</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="174">174 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -272,8 +278,8 @@
(
<date>1979</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="51">51</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="51">51 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="5" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -293,8 +299,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="75">75</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="83">83</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">83</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="6" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -306,6 +312,7 @@
</author>
(
<ref>vorige N.) a.a.O.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="7" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -323,6 +330,7 @@
<surname>Szalai</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Petrella</surname>
@@ -330,8 +338,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="3">3</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="9">9 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">9 ff.</citedRange>
+ )
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -347,13 +355,14 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Rehbinder</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="171">171</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="171">171 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="8" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -371,7 +380,8 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="25" to="25">25</biblScope>
(
<date>1975</date>
- ) 97 ff. -
+ )
+ <citedRange>97 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">Vgl. auch</seg>
@@ -391,8 +401,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="509">509</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="526">526</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">526</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="9" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -411,8 +421,8 @@
(
<date>1977</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="507">507</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="507">507 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="10" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -425,7 +435,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="175">175</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="175">175.</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -445,6 +455,7 @@
<surname>Armer</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Grimshaw</surname>
@@ -452,10 +463,9 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="3">3</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="18">18</citedRange>
- )
- <seg type="comment">Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen</seg>
- ,
+ <citedRange unit="page">18</citedRange>
+ ).
+ <seg type="comment">Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen.</seg>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -471,17 +481,15 @@
<surname>Tomasson</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Comparative Studies in Sociology</title>
- Vol.
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="1" to="1">1</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="1" to="1">Vol. 1</biblScope>
(
- <pubPlace>Greenwich, Conn</pubPlace>
- .
+ <pubPlace>Greenwich, Conn.</pubPlace>
<date>1978</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope>
- . —
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="1" to="1">1</citedRange>
+ —
<seg type="comment">Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen</seg>
.
</bibl>
@@ -492,23 +500,26 @@
<surname>Rokkan</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Verba</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Viet</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Almasy</surname>
</persName>
</author>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="117">117 ff</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="117">117 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -516,8 +527,8 @@
<surname>Vallier</surname>
</persName>
</author>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="423">423 ff</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="423">423 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -525,11 +536,13 @@
<surname>Almasy</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Balandier</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Delatte</surname>
@@ -555,8 +568,7 @@
<pubPlace>New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta</pubPlace>
<date>1967</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="375">375</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="375">375 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="12" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -568,12 +580,11 @@
</author>
,
<title level="m">Les règles de la methode sociologique</title>
-
<publisher>(PUF,</publisher>
<pubPlace>Paris</pubPlace>
<date>1977</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="137">137</biblScope>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="137">137</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -584,9 +595,7 @@
<surname>Smelser</surname>
</persName>
</author>
-
- <biblScope unit="page" from="2">2</biblScope>
- f.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="2">2 f.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author/>
@@ -607,8 +616,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="13">13</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="15">15 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">15 ff.</citedRange>
+ )
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">Ähnlich auch</seg>
@@ -621,16 +630,15 @@
<title level="m">Social Institutions - Comparative Method</title>
, in:
<title level="j">International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences</title>
- Bd.
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="14" to="14">14</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="14" to="14">Bd. 14</biblScope>
(
<pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
<date>1968</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="421">421</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="423">423</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">423</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="14" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -640,6 +648,7 @@
<surname>Boesch</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Eckensberger</surname>
@@ -653,17 +662,20 @@
<surname>Graumann</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Handbuch der Psychologie</title>
- , Bd.
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="Vll 1 (2. Auf" to="Vll 1 (2. Auf">Vll 1 (2. Auf</biblScope>
- ],
+ ,
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="VII" to="VII">Bd. VII</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="issue" from="1" to="1">1</biblScope>
+ (
+ <edition>2. Aufl.</edition>
+ ,
<date>1969</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="514">514</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="520">520 ff</citedRange>
- .) —
+ <citedRange unit="page">520 ff.</citedRange>
+ ) —
<seg type="comment">Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist</seg>
,
</bibl>
@@ -674,12 +686,13 @@
<surname>Naroll</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Cohen</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology</title>
(
<pubPlace>New York, London</pubPlace>
@@ -693,8 +706,8 @@
<surname>Smelser</surname>
</persName>
</author>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="168">168 f</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="168">168 f.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -727,8 +740,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="267">267</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="270">270 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">270 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="16" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -741,7 +754,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 5</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="80">80</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="80">80.</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -761,6 +774,7 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Rebbinder</surname>
@@ -768,8 +782,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="151">151</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="159">159</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">159</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="18" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -790,8 +804,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="81">81</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="89">89 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">89 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="19" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -808,7 +822,8 @@
<pubPlace>Paris</pubPlace>
<date>1972</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="188">188 N. 1</biblScope>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="188">188</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="footnote" from="1">N. 1</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -830,8 +845,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="305">305</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="330">330 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">330 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="21" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -845,8 +860,8 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 17</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="157">157</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="157">157 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="22" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -864,18 +879,18 @@
<surname>Kaiser</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Vogler</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
- <title level="m">Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung</title>
+ (Hrsg.),
+ <title level="m">Strafrecht, Strafrechtsvergleichung</title>
(
<date>1975</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="79">79</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="79">79 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">— Siehe auch</seg>
@@ -884,6 +899,7 @@
<surname>Villmow</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Albrecht</surname>
@@ -898,8 +914,8 @@
(
<date>1979</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="163">163</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="163">163 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="23" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -910,7 +926,6 @@
<forename type="first">K.</forename>
<forename type="middle">H.</forename>
<surname>Neumayer</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -922,8 +937,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="45">45</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="48">48</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">48</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="24" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -942,13 +957,13 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Rehbinder</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="56">56</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="56">56 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="25" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -962,8 +977,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 18</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="101">101</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="101">101 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="26" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -981,6 +995,7 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Rehbinder</surname>
@@ -988,8 +1003,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="178">178</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="186">186 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">186 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="27" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1008,7 +1023,7 @@
<surname>Blankenburg</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">innovations in the Legal Services</title>
(
<pubPlace>Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim</pubPlace>
@@ -1038,7 +1053,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Abel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1052,8 +1066,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="219">219</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="224">224 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">224 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="30" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1064,8 +1078,7 @@
<surname>Smelser</surname>
</persName>
</author>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="175">175</biblScope>
- f.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="175">175 f.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">— Für die Kriminologie siehe</seg>
@@ -1086,6 +1099,7 @@
<surname>Blazicek</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Janeksela</surname>
@@ -1101,10 +1115,10 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="233">233</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="240">240</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page">240</citedRange>
)
- <seg type="comment">Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style</seg>
- “,
+ <seg type="comment">Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style“</seg>
+ ,
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1123,8 +1137,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="457">457</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="479">479</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">479</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="31" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1137,10 +1151,9 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 13</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="15">15</citedRange>
- ,
- <citedRange unit="page" from="25">25</citedRange>
- f.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="15">15,</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="25">25 f.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="32" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1156,12 +1169,11 @@
<title level="j">Demokratie und Recht</title>
<date>1979</date>
/
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="1" to="1">1</biblScope>
- S.
- <biblScope unit="page" from="23">23</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="/1" to="/1">1</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="page" from="23">S. 23</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="31">31 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">31 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch</seg>
@@ -1170,6 +1182,7 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Puttfarken</surname>
@@ -1183,20 +1196,21 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Puttfarken</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Rechtsvergleichung</title>
(
<date>1978</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="395">395</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="402">402 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">402 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="33" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1212,10 +1226,9 @@
<title level="j">HM discussion papers</title>
<date>1978</date>
—
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="23" to="23">23</biblScope>
+ <idno type="document">23</idno>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="5">5</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="5">5 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="34" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1225,14 +1238,14 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kötz</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="30">30</biblScope>
- f.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="30">30 f.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="35" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1251,6 +1264,7 @@
<surname>Armer</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Grimsbaw</surname>
@@ -1258,8 +1272,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="49">49</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="50">50 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">50 ff.</citedRange>
+ );
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1267,8 +1281,8 @@
<surname>Smelser</surname>
</persName>
</author>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="182">182 f</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="182">182 f.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1286,8 +1300,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="361">361</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="364">364 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">364 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="36" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1302,6 +1316,7 @@
<surname>Malewswka</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Peyre</surname>
@@ -1315,6 +1330,7 @@
<surname>Szalai</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Petrella</surname>
@@ -1322,8 +1338,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="131">131</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="157">157 f</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">157 f.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="37" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1344,7 +1360,7 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="176">176</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="185">185</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page">185</citedRange>
)
</bibl>
<bibl>
@@ -1360,25 +1376,25 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">van</forename>
<surname>Koolwiyk</surname>
- /
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<surname>
<persName>
<surname>Wieken-Mayser</surname>
</persName>
</surname>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung</title>
- , Bd.
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="2" to="2">2</biblScope>
+ ,
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="2" to="2">Bd. 2</biblScope>
(
<date>1975</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="113">113</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="124">124 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">124 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="38" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1396,16 +1412,19 @@
<surname>Rokkan</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Verba</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Viet</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Almasy</surname>
@@ -1413,8 +1432,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="56">56</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="80">80</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">80</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="39" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1432,6 +1451,7 @@
<surname>Drobnig</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Rehbinder</surname>
@@ -1439,8 +1459,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="123">123</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="134">134 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">134 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="40" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1453,14 +1473,13 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="42">42</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="42">42.</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="41" type="footnote" place="bottom">
<bibl>
<seg type="comment">Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf</seg>
-
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Merton</surname>
@@ -1475,9 +1494,9 @@
,
<edition>erweiterte Aufl.</edition>
<date>1968</date>
- , S.
- <biblScope unit="page" from="82">82 ff</biblScope>
- .):
+ ,
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="82">S. 82 ff.</citedRange>
+ ):
<seg type="comment">Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data</seg>
".
<publisher>
@@ -1491,7 +1510,7 @@
<pubPlace>Paris</pubPlace>
<date>1977</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="40">40</biblScope>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="40">40.</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -1520,10 +1539,10 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 4</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="194">194 ff</citedRange>
- .,
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="194">194 ff.,</citedRange>
+
<citedRange unit="page" from="221">221 f.</citedRange>
- -
+ -
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">Siehe auch</seg>
@@ -1542,8 +1561,7 @@
</publisher>
<date>1979</date>
—
- <biblScope unit="page" from="13">13) 2</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="13">13) 2 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">- Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher</seg>
@@ -1555,8 +1573,8 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 37</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="197">197</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="197">197 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="45" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1569,8 +1587,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 4</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="207">207</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="207">207 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">— Siehe auch</seg>
@@ -1587,8 +1604,8 @@
(
<date>1978</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="161">161</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="161">161 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="46" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1602,8 +1619,8 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 33</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="3">3</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="3">3 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="47" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1616,7 +1633,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="176">176</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="176">176.</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -1631,8 +1648,8 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 4</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="55">55 ff</citedRange>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="55">55 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1648,8 +1665,7 @@
(
<date>1979</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="154">154</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="154">154 ff.</citedRange>
<seg type="comment">mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“ und „unähnliche Gesellschaften“ wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt</seg>
.
</bibl>
@@ -1663,8 +1679,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 13</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="16">16</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="16">16 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="49" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1675,13 +1690,14 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kötz</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="70">70</biblScope>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="70">70</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -1700,7 +1716,7 @@
<title level="m">European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper</title>
<date>1977</date>
-
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="8" to="8">8</biblScope>
+ <idno type="document">8</idno>
).
</bibl>
<bibl>
@@ -1727,14 +1743,15 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kötz</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="1" to="1">1</biblScope>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="110">110</biblScope>
- f. —
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="110">110 f.</citedRange>
+ —
<seg type="comment">Kritisch</seg>
</bibl>
<bibl>
@@ -1746,8 +1763,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 4</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="58">58</citedRange>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="58">58 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="52" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1757,7 +1773,6 @@
<forename type="first">IDE-International</forename>
<forename type="middle">Research</forename>
<surname>Group</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1768,7 +1783,7 @@
<pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
<date>1980</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="Chapter">Chapter VIII</biblScope>
+ <citedRange unit="chapter" from="VIII">Chapter VIII</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -1779,13 +1794,14 @@
<surname>Zweigert</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kötz</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="78">78</biblScope>
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="78">78</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -1801,7 +1817,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 52</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="Chapter">Chapter VIII</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="chapter" from="VIII">Chapter VIII</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -1836,8 +1852,8 @@
(
<date>1970</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="1">1 ff</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="1">1 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1853,8 +1869,7 @@
(
<date>1970</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="443">443</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="443">443 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="57" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1887,7 +1902,6 @@
<forename type="first">H.</forename>
<forename type="middle">M.</forename>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</editor>
,
@@ -1896,8 +1910,8 @@
<pubPlace>San Francisco, Washington, London</pubPlace>
<date>1978</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="97">97</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="97">97 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="58" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1915,8 +1929,7 @@
(
<date>1979</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="362">362</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="362">362 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="59" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1930,8 +1943,8 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="23">23 ff</citedRange>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="23">23 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1939,8 +1952,7 @@
<surname>Smelser</surname>
</persName>
</author>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="167">167</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="167">167 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="60" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1959,6 +1971,7 @@
<surname>Szalai</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Petrella</surname>
@@ -1966,8 +1979,8 @@
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="95">95</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="101">101</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">101</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="61" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1978,6 +1991,7 @@
<surname>Nader</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Todd</surname>
@@ -1995,7 +2009,6 @@
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">Siehe zum entsprechenden</seg>
<title level="m">Problem in der Kriminologie</title>
-
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Kaiser</surname>
@@ -2015,6 +2028,7 @@
<surname>Blazicek</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Janeksela</surname>
@@ -2023,8 +2037,8 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 30</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="235">235 f</citedRange>
- .,
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="235">235 f.</citedRange>
+ ,
<citedRange unit="page" from="242">242</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
@@ -2045,8 +2059,7 @@
(
<date>1978</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="221">221</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="221">221 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="64" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2057,11 +2070,13 @@
<surname>Abel-Smith</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Zander</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Brooke</surname>
@@ -2088,8 +2103,8 @@
(
<date>1978</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="228">228 ff</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="228">228 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -2097,11 +2112,13 @@
<surname>Schuyt</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Groenendijk</surname>
</persName>
</author>
+ /
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Sloot</surname>
@@ -2115,8 +2132,7 @@
(
<date>1978</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="109">109</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="109">109 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="65" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2131,14 +2147,15 @@
<title level="m">Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems</title>
,
<title level="j">Polish Sociological Bulletin</title>
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="21 No. 1" to="21 No. 1">21 No. 1</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="21" to="21">21</biblScope>
+ <biblScope unit="issue" from="1" to="1">No. 1</biblScope>
(
<date>1970</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="83">83</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="88">88 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">88 ff.</citedRange>
+ )
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">— Siehe auch </seg>
@@ -2147,13 +2164,11 @@
<surname>Ziegen</surname>
</persName>
</author>
-
<title level="m">Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht</title>
(
<date>1975</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="196">196</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="196">196 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="66" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2174,8 +2189,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="85">85</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="88">88 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">88 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="67" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2193,23 +2208,26 @@
<surname>Podgdrecki</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Kaupen</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<forename type="first">van</forename>
<surname>Houtte</surname>
- /
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<surname>
<persName>
<surname>Vinke</surname>
</persName>
</surname>
+ /
<surname>
<persName>
<surname>Kutchinsky</surname>
@@ -2223,8 +2241,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="101">101</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="126">126</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">126</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="68" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2260,17 +2278,18 @@
<surname>König</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor schung</title>
- , Bd.
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="4 (3. Aufl" to="4 (3. Aufl">4 (3. Aufl</biblScope>
- .
+ ,
+ <biblScope unit="volume" from="4" to="4">Bd. 4</biblScope>
+ (
+ <edition>3. Aufl.</edition>
<date>1974</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="405">405</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="414">414 f</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">414 f.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="70" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2282,19 +2301,17 @@
</persName>
</author>
,
- <title level="m">Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechts forschung in Entwicklungsländern</title>
+ <title level="m">Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern</title>
,
<title level="j">Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie</title>
April
<date>1979</date>
,
- <biblScope unit="volume" from="Son derheft 2" to="Son derheft 2">Son derheft 2</biblScope>
- , S.
- <biblScope unit="page" from="5">5</biblScope>
- ff.
- </bibl>
- <bibl>
- <seg type="signal">mwNachw.</seg>
+ <seg type="comment">Sonderheft 2</seg>
+ ,
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="5">S. 5 ff.</citedRange>
+ <seg type="comment">mwNachw</seg>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="71" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2306,12 +2323,12 @@
</persName>
</author>
,
- <title level="m">Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchungprivatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko</title>
+ <title level="m">Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko</title>
(
<date>1976</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="37">37</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="37">37 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="72" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2352,8 +2369,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="151">151</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="152">152</citedRange>
- )
+ <citedRange unit="page">152</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="74" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2369,8 +2386,8 @@
(
<date>1972</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="9">9 ff</biblScope>
- .;
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="9">9 ff.</citedRange>
+ ;
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -2386,13 +2403,13 @@
<surname>Szalai</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
+ /
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Petrella</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- <biblScope unit="page" from="49">49</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="49">49 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<seg type="signal">sowie</seg>
@@ -2406,7 +2423,7 @@
(
<ref>oben N. 52</ref>
)
- <citedRange unit="page" from="Chapter">Chapter I</citedRange>
+ <citedRange unit="chapter" from="I" to="I">Chapter I</citedRange>
.
</bibl>
</note>
@@ -2426,7 +2443,7 @@
<surname>Kulcsár</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
- (Hrsg.),
+ (Hrsg.),
<title level="m">Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences</title>
(
<pubPlace>Budapest</pubPlace>
@@ -2434,8 +2451,8 @@
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="97">97</biblScope>
(
- <citedRange unit="page" from="99">99 ff</citedRange>
- .)
+ <citedRange unit="page">99 ff.</citedRange>
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="76" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2453,8 +2470,8 @@
(
<date>1973</date>
)
- <biblScope unit="page" from="403">403</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="403">403 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="77" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2471,8 +2488,7 @@
<title level="j">Interview und Analyse</title>
<date>1979</date>
,
- <biblScope unit="page" from="377">377</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="377">377 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="78" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2491,8 +2507,7 @@
(
<date>1979</date>
),
- <biblScope unit="page" from="159">159</biblScope>
- ff.
+ <citedRange unit="page" from="159">159 ff.</citedRange>
</bibl>
</note>
</body>
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.txt b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.txt
index f9819efbf43132209634063446696949000a8513..6aa852638f2545b854881f7161f514d02745577e 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.txt
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.txt
@@ -1,74 +1,74 @@
-1 A. Phillips,, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.
-2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman,, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.
-3 M. Sawer and M. Simms,, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).
-4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.
-5 S. Walby,, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379
-6 I. Kant,, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6, s. 146.
-7 U. Vogel,, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.
-8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon,, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.
-9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone,, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.
-11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.
-12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.
-13 A. Bottomley,, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.
-14 D. West,, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault,, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.
-15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman,, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.
-16 H.S. Maine,, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.
-17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz,, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.
-18 M. Grossberg,, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.
-19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves,, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.
-20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel,, ‘“The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.
-21 C. Pateman,, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan,, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.
-23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W .); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A .); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas .); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic .); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A .). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (see R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).
-24 M. Freeman,, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74; R. Collier,, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.
-25 P.S. Atiyah,, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.
-26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C ., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C ., Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave,, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton,, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.
-27 L. J. Weitzman,, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.
-28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.
-29 Balfour Balfour v. [1919] 2 K.B. 571.
+1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77..
+2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183..
+3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).
+4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072..
+5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379
+6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6, s. 146..
+7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75..
+8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97..
+9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442..
+11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1..
+12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196..
+13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61..
+14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98..
+15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30..
+16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174..
+17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160..
+18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix..
+19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220..
+20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘“The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117..
+21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59..
+23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W .); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A .); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas .); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic .); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A .). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (see R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257)..
+24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74; R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.
+25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3..
+26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C ., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C ., Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997..
+27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff..
+28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52..
+29 Balfour Balfour v. [1919] 2 K.B. 571..
30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan ., Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).
31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K .); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z .); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth .)
-32 G.S. Frost,, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.
-33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.
-34 Compare U. Vogel,, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.
+32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.
+33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38..
+34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59..
35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).
-36 Compare J. Pahl,, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.
-37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, P. Parkinson and J. Behrens,, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham,, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue, ., ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.
-38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.
-39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.
+36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5..
+37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, P. Parkinson and J. Behrens, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue ., ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59..
+38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24..
+39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4..
40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W .).
-41 J. Nedelsky,, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff.
-42 C.B. Macpherson,, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.
-43 For example, N. Howell,, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.
-44 P. Baron,, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.
-45 id., p. 24; B. Fehlberg,, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185, per Brown-Wilkinson L
-46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34; M. Richardson,, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.
-47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.
-48 B. Fehlberg,, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.
-49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).
-50 1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).
-52 1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).
-53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52, and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W .). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)
-55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.
-56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave,, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.
-57 Compare K. O’Donovan,, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.
-58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich,, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon,, The New Family and the New Property (1981).
-59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)
-60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson,, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.
-61 For discussion, see J. Riley,, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.
-62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan,, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.
-63 B. Bennett,, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.
-64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.
+41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff..
+42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120..
+43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93..
+44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23..
+45 id., p. 24; B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185, per Brown-Wilkinson L
+46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34; M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368..
+47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43..
+48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675..
+49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.)..
+50 1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.)..
+52 1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.)..
+53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52, and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W .). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.).
+55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936..
+56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94..
+57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18..
+58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).
+59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.).
+60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100..
+61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412..
+62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133..
+63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206..
+64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4..
65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.
-66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman,, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).
-67 M.L. Shanley,, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.
-68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.
-69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave, ‘Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.
-70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas,, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.
-71 C. Colebrook,, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.
-72 M. Albertson Fineman,, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.
-73 Compare K. O’Donovan,, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.
-74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W .). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon,, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission,, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).
-75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review,, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington,, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.
-76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service,, The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).
-77 id., p. 3.
-78 Above, n. 30.
\ No newline at end of file
+66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).
+67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46..
+68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30..
+69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave ‘Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4..
+70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701..
+71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300..
+72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7..
+73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3..
+74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W .). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).
+75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.
+76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).
+77 id., p. 3..
+78 Above, n. 30..
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.txt b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.txt
index 1f92ec3225481acff81e85083398b6854297a639..b3e6cbe2cb07214667a5bb5314b707f28795cafe 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.txt
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.txt
@@ -1,49 +1,49 @@
-1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones,, ‘“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.
-3 R. Goff,, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can. .. be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases.. .’. A. Dicey,, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.
-4 J. Smith,, The Law of Contract (1989)
-6 See, for example, D. Kennedy,, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.
-7 B. Hepple,, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470, at 485 and 481.
-8 P.A. Thomas,, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.
-9 R. Cotterrell,, Law’s Community (1995) 296.
-10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler,, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.
+1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14..
+3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can. .. be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases.. .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20..
+4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)
+6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685..
+7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470, at 485 and 481..
+8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19..
+9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296..
+10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285..
11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9, recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd. 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31) This has yet to happen.
-12 Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education,, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. ACLEC, id., para 4.6.
-14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie,, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15, at 24–6).
-15 J. MacFarlane, M. Jeeves and A. Boon,, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835, at 836.
-16 T.H. Huxley,, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.
-17 J.S. Mill,, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.
-18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.
-19 id., para. 5.11.
-20 F.R. Leavis,, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.
-21 See, further, A. Bradney,, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).
-22 P. Goodrich, ‘Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks, op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.
-23 S. Turow,, One L (1977) 106.
-24 O. Kahn-Freund,, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121, at 129.
-25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).
-26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.
-29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King,, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.
-30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th ., 1947) at 256 and 257.
-31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.
-32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone,, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin,, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.
-33 R. Collier,, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427, at 429.
-34 P. McAuslan,, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1, at 8.
-35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.
-38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.
-39 P. Samuelson,, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256, at 258.
-40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38, at 46.
-41 J. Wilson, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143, at 152.
-42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).
-43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer and N. Whatley,, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.
+12 Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. ACLEC, id., para 4.6..
+14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15, at 24–6)..
+15 J. MacFarlane, M. Jeeves and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835, at 836..
+16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215..
+17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218..
+18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32..
+19 id., para. 5.11..
+20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.
+21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).
+22 P. Goodrich ‘Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks, op. cit., n. 1, p. 59..
+23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106..
+24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121, at 129..
+25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.)..
+26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120..
+29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.
+30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th ., 1947) at 256 and 257..
+31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68..
+32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6..
+33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427, at 429..
+34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1, at 8..
+35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5..
+38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22..
+39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256, at 258..
+40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38, at 46..
+41 J. Wilson, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143, at 152..
+42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54)..
+43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.
44 id., p 35
-45 L. Skwarok,, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189, at 189.
-46 N. Bastin,, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12, at 13.
-47 A. Ridley,, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281, at 282.
-48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas,, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246, at 248.
-49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.
+45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189, at 189..
+46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12, at 13..
+47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281, at 282..
+48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246, at 248..
+49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284..
50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.
-51 P. Birks,, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.
-52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.
-53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.
-54 P. Harris,, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110, at 112.
-55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.
-57 G. Steiner,, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.
\ No newline at end of file
+51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24..
+52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283..
+53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248..
+54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110, at 112..
+55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3..
+57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20..
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.txt b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.txt
index 5ade5dad85aabd81bd25007ed6954ceaa37ad9c1..df284809ae6b7233852293c258f9bc158ae08401 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.txt
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.txt
@@ -1,63 +1,63 @@
-1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.
+1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83..
2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über, Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine ', 1976.
3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur ' Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung ' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel ' Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung ', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.
-4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.
-5 Black 1973, S. 125 ff.
-6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.
-7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.
+4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85..
+5 Black 1973, S. 125 ff..
+6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183..
+7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112..
8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976
9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.
-10 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.
-11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.
+10 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff..
+11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff..
12 Koch 1975, S. 75, der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.
-13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden,, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.
-14 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.
+13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.
+14 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff..
15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.
-16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.
-17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.; Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 82 ff.
+16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff..
+17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.; Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 82 ff..
18 Projektbericht ‚Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher ‘, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner; Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.
-19 Explizit bei Baumgärtei 1976, S. 113-128.
+19 Explizit bei Baumgärtei 1976, S. 113-128..
21 Projektbericht ‚Rechtsschutzversicherung‘. (Blankenburg; Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.
22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.
23 Reifner 1979.
24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.
-25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.
-26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.
+25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375..
+26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138..
27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff, vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89, Fn. 17,
28 Reifner 1978.
-29 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.
-30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.
-31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35; Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.
+29 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff..
+30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98..
+31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35; Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49..
32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.; sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.
-33 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.
-34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.
+33 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff..
+34 Ebenda, S. 138-186..
35 Luhmann 1969.
36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des ‚Vermeidens‘vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.
Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.
-Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, , 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.
+Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.
Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.
Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.
Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.
Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.
Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.
Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.
-Carlin, Jerome- und Sheldon Messinger, , 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.
-Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75; Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.
+Carlin, Jerome- und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.
+Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75; Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694..
Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.
-Felstiner, William L. F ., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.
-Felstiner, William L. F ., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.
-Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.
+Felstiner, William L. F ., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94..
+Felstiner, William L. F ., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706..
+Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160..
Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.
Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.
-Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.
+Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main..
Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/Rijn.
Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.
Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.
Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.
Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.
-Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.
-Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, , 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.
-Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.
+Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104..
+Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.
+Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375..
Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.
Steinbach, E ., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.
-Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.
\ No newline at end of file
+Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306..
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt
index a2825ff4105a6a3d5c467f8751b39cc2b5d2a940..2383f444bfeb1b47cba0ca0a2b2a93537a3c38c9 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl-refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt
@@ -1,78 +1,78 @@
Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976); Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).
-1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.
-2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3)
+1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff..
+2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3).
3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.
-4 Dazu R. Abel,, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.
-5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83)
-6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.
-7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.) Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff.
-8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526)
-9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.
-10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.
-11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18) Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.
-12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.
-13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.) Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423)
-14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl., 1969) 514 (520 ff.) — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.
-15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.)
-16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.
-17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159)
-18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.)
-19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.
-20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.)
-21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.
-22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.
-23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer,, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48)
-24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.
-25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.
-26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.)
+4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff..
+5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83).
+6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O..
+7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.) Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff..
+8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526).
+9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff..
+10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175..
+11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18) Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff..
+12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137..
+13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.) Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).
+14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl., 1969) 514 (520 ff.) — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115..
+15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.).
+16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80..
+17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159).
+18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.).
+19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1..
+20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.).
+21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff..
+22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff..
+23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48).
+24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff..
+25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff..
+26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.).
27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).
-28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.
-29 Dazu R. Abel,, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.)
-30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240) Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style “, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479)
-31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.
-32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979/1 S. 23 (31 ff.) Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.)
-33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 — 23) 5 ff.
-34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.
-35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.) Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.)
-36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.)
-37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185) Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.)
-38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80)
-39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.)
-40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.
-41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton, der sie am Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data ". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.
+28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60..
+29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.).
+30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240) Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style “, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479).
+31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f..
+32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979/1 S. 23 (31 ff.) Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.).
+33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 — 23) 5 ff..
+34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f..
+35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.) Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.).
+36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.).
+37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185) Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.).
+38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80).
+39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.).
+40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42..
+41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton, der sie am Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data ". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40..
43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).
-44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979 — 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.
-45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.
-46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.
-47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.
-48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“und „unähnliche Gesellschaften“wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.
-49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.
+44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979 — 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff..
+45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff..
+46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff..
+47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176..
+48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“und „unähnliche Gesellschaften“wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff..
+49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70..
50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 - 8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.
-51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.
-52 IDE-International Research Group,, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.
-53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.
-54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.
+51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff..
+52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII..
+53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78..
+54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII..
55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.
-56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.
-57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders ., The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson,, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.
-58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.
-59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.
-60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101)
+56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff..
+57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders ., The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff..
+58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff..
+59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff..
+60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101).
61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).
-62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.
-63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.
+62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242..
+63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff..
64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.
-65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.) — Siehe auch Ziegen Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.
-66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology 1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.)
-67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126)
-68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).
-69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.)
+65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.) — Siehe auch Ziegen Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff..
+66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology 1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.).
+67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126).
+68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.)..
+69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.).
70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Sonderheft 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.
-71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.
-72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.
-73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152)
-74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.
-75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems “, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.)
-76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.
-77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.
-78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.
\ No newline at end of file
+71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff..
+72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407..
+73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152).
+74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I..
+75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems “, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.).
+76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff..
+77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff..
+78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff..
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml
index 8b61b0c39a9d004781d3a3dda44b3bf3df8c6e32..23fc24d25d16d08a69e06354114c09667b0bbad7 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Phillips</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -40,6 +39,7 @@
<date>1991</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="77">77.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="2" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Pateman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
, ‘“
@@ -66,6 +65,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="27" to="27">27</biblScope>
<title level="j">Political Studies</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="183">183.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="3" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Simms</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
,
@@ -122,6 +121,7 @@
<title level="j">Melbourne University Law Rev</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="1072">1072.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="5" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -130,7 +130,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">S.</forename>
<surname>Walby</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -149,7 +148,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">I.</forename>
<surname>Kant</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -164,6 +162,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="125" to="6">125–6,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="146">s. 146.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="7" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -172,7 +171,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">U.</forename>
<surname>Vogel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -190,6 +188,7 @@
<date>1994</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="75">75.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="8" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -205,7 +204,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">L.</forename>
<surname>Gordon</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
, ‘
@@ -214,6 +212,7 @@
<ref>in id.</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="97">p. 97.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="9" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -233,7 +232,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">W.</forename>
<surname>Blackstone</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -244,6 +242,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="442">442.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="11" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -257,6 +256,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 7</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="80" to="1">pp. 80–1.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="12" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@
<date>1987</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="196">196.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="13" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -281,7 +282,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Bottomley</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -294,6 +294,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="56">56,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="61">61.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="14" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -302,7 +303,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>West</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -322,7 +322,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Foucault</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -338,6 +337,7 @@
<date>1980</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="98">98.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="15" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -347,7 +347,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.J.</forename>
<surname>Mossman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -358,6 +357,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="3" to="3">3</biblScope>
<title level="j">Aust. J. of Law and Society</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="30">30.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="16" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -366,7 +366,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">H.S.</forename>
<surname>Maine</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -377,6 +376,7 @@
<date>1912</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="174">174.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="17" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -390,7 +390,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.J.</forename>
<surname>Horwitz</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -399,6 +398,7 @@
<date>1977</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="160">160.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="18" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -407,7 +407,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Grossberg</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -416,6 +415,7 @@
<date>1985</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="ix">ix.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="19" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -432,7 +432,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">S.</forename>
<surname>Staves</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -443,6 +442,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="4," to="4,">4</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="220">220.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="20" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -456,7 +456,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.B.</forename>
<surname>Siegel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘“
@@ -468,6 +467,7 @@
<title level="j">Yale Law J</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="2117">2117.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="21" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -476,7 +476,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Pateman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -491,7 +490,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">K.</forename>
<surname>O’Donovan</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -500,6 +498,7 @@
<date>1993</date>
),
<biblScope unit="page" from="especially">especially 43–59.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="23" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -552,6 +551,7 @@
<title level="j">All E.R</title>
.
<title level="m">257).</title>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="24" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -560,7 +560,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Freeman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -585,7 +584,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Collier</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -612,7 +610,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.S.</forename>
<surname>Atiyah</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -623,6 +620,7 @@
<date>1995</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="3">3.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="26" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -666,7 +664,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Neave</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -682,7 +679,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Dalton</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -694,6 +690,7 @@
<title level="j">Yale Law J</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="997">997.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="27" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -703,7 +700,6 @@
<forename type="first">L.</forename>
<forename type="middle">J.</forename>
<surname>Weitzman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -712,6 +708,7 @@
<date>1981</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="347">347 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="28" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -725,6 +722,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 18</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="52">p. 52.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="29" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -740,6 +738,7 @@
<date>1919</date>
]
<biblScope unit="page" from="2">2 K.B. 571.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="30" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -799,7 +798,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">G.S.</forename>
<surname>Frost</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -830,6 +828,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 18</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="38">p. 38.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="34" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -839,7 +838,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">U.</forename>
<surname>Vogel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -864,6 +862,7 @@
<date>1991</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="59">59.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="35" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -882,7 +881,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.</forename>
<surname>Pahl</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -891,6 +889,7 @@
<date>1989</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="5">5.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="37" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -920,7 +919,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.</forename>
<surname>Behrens</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</forename>
,
@@ -940,7 +938,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.T.</forename>
<surname>Oldham</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -958,7 +955,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Donahue</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
., ‘
@@ -970,6 +966,7 @@
<title level="j">Michigan Law Rev</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="59">59.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="38" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -998,6 +995,7 @@
</author>
,
<ref>op. cit., n. 24.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="39" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1023,6 +1021,7 @@
<date>1995</date>
),
<ref>n. 4.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="40" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1040,7 +1039,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.</forename>
<surname>Nedelsky</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1049,6 +1047,7 @@
<date>1990</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="especially">especially 223 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="42" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1057,7 +1056,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.B.</forename>
<surname>Macpherson</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1066,6 +1064,7 @@
<date>1973</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="120">120.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="43" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1075,7 +1074,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">N.</forename>
<surname>Howell</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘“
@@ -1087,6 +1085,7 @@
<title level="j">Aust. Feminist Law J</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="93">93.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="44" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1095,7 +1094,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Baron</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1106,6 +1104,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="13" to="13">13</biblScope>
<title level="j">Law in Context</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="23">23.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="45" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1118,7 +1117,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">B.</forename>
<surname>Fehlberg</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1164,7 +1162,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1176,6 +1173,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="16" to="16">16</biblScope>
<title level="j">Legal Studies</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="368">368.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="47" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1203,6 +1201,7 @@
</author>
,
<ref>op. cit., n. 43.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="48" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1211,7 +1210,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">B.</forename>
<surname>Fehlberg</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1223,6 +1221,7 @@
<title level="j">Modern Law Rev</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="675">675.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="49" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1235,6 +1234,7 @@
<title level="j">N.S.W.L.R</title>
.
<title level="m">577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</title>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="50" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1242,6 +1242,7 @@
<date>1991</date>
)
<title level="m">25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</title>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="52" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1249,6 +1250,7 @@
<date>1994</date>
)
<title level="m">A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</title>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="53" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1271,7 +1273,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="A">A.S.C. 56–270</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">N.S.W.C.A.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="55" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1293,6 +1295,7 @@
<date>1995</date>
]
<title level="m">1 All E.R. 936.</title>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="56" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1309,7 +1312,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.A.</forename>
<surname>Neave</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
,
@@ -1318,6 +1320,7 @@
<date>1984</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="94">94.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="57" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1327,7 +1330,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">K.</forename>
<surname>O’Donovan</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1336,6 +1338,7 @@
<date>1985</date>
),
<biblScope unit="page" from="especially">especially 112–18.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="58" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1352,7 +1355,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.A.</forename>
<surname>Reich</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1375,7 +1377,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.A.</forename>
<surname>Glendon</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1392,7 +1393,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="29">29 N.S.W.L.R. 188</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">C.A.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="60" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1410,7 +1411,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Parkinson</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1421,6 +1421,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="11" to="11">11</biblScope>
<title level="j">Australian J. Family Law</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="100">100.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="61" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1430,7 +1431,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.</forename>
<surname>Riley</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1442,6 +1442,7 @@
<title level="j">Sydney Law Rev</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="412">412.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="62" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1459,7 +1460,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.A.</forename>
<surname>Doolan</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
, ‘
@@ -1472,6 +1472,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="111">111,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="133">133.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="63" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1480,7 +1481,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">B.</forename>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="18" to="18">18</biblScope>
<title level="j">J. of Law and Society</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="206">206.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="64" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1512,6 +1513,7 @@
</author>
,
<ref>op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="65" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1529,7 +1531,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">L.J.</forename>
<surname>Weitzman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1546,7 +1547,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.L.</forename>
<surname>Shanley</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@
<date>1989</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="46">46.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="68" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1591,6 +1592,7 @@
</author>
,
<ref>op. cit., n. 30.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="69" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1614,7 +1616,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Neave</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
‘
@@ -1632,6 +1633,7 @@
<date>1989</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="262" to="4">262–4.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="70" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1641,7 +1643,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">L.</forename>
<surname>Sarmas</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1653,6 +1654,7 @@
<title level="j">Melbourne University Law Rev</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="701">701.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="71" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1661,7 +1663,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Colebrook</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1674,6 +1675,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="295">295,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="300">300.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="72" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1683,7 +1685,6 @@
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<forename type="middle">Albertson</forename>
<surname>Fineman</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1692,6 +1693,7 @@
<date>1995</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="7">7.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="73" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1701,7 +1703,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">K.</forename>
<surname>O’Donovan</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1715,6 +1716,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="424">424,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="431" to="3">431–3.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="74" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1739,7 +1741,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.M.</forename>
<surname>Lyon</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
,
@@ -1754,7 +1755,6 @@
<forename type="first">New</forename>
<forename type="middle">South Wales Law Reform</forename>
<surname>Commission</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1771,7 +1771,6 @@
<forename type="first">Eds. of the Harvard</forename>
<forename type="middle">Law</forename>
<surname>Review</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1790,7 +1789,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Overington</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1818,7 +1816,6 @@
<forename type="first">Gay</forename>
<forename type="middle">Rights</forename>
<surname>Service</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1833,11 +1830,13 @@
<ref>id.</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="3">p. 3.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="78" type="footnote" place="bottom">
<bibl>
<ref>Above, n. 30.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
</body>
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.xml b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.xml
index 481576e84dc0d0df0f1f0a15189bcce7a684d1b5..c927cbf5c57a3aaeda037dbd967f21fe546d944a 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.xml
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.xml
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">G.</forename>
<surname>Jones</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -41,6 +40,7 @@
<date>1996</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="14">14.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="3" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Goff</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -69,7 +68,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Dicey</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -78,6 +76,7 @@
<date>1883</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="20">20.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="4" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -86,7 +85,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.</forename>
<surname>Smith</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -103,7 +101,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>Kennedy</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -115,6 +112,7 @@
<title level="j">Harvard Law Rev</title>
.
<biblScope unit="page" from="1685">1685.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="7" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -123,7 +121,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">B.</forename>
<surname>Hepple</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -136,6 +133,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="470">470,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 485 and 481.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="8" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -144,7 +142,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.A.</forename>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -162,6 +159,7 @@
<date>1997</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="19">19.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="9" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -170,7 +168,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Cotterrell</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -179,6 +176,7 @@
<date>1995</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="296">296.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="10" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -189,7 +187,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">S.</forename>
<surname>Wheeler</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</publisher>
, ‘
@@ -204,6 +201,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 8</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="at">at p. 285.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="11" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -260,7 +258,6 @@
<forename type="first">Committee of Inquiry</forename>
<forename type="middle">into Higher</forename>
<surname>Education</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -295,6 +292,7 @@
<ref>id.</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="para">para 4.6.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="14" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -315,7 +313,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">F.</forename>
<surname>Cownie</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
, ‘
@@ -328,6 +325,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="15">15,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 24–6).</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="15" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -345,7 +343,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Boon</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</forename>
, ‘
@@ -359,6 +356,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="835">835,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 836.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="16" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -367,7 +365,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">T.H.</forename>
<surname>Huxley</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -380,6 +377,7 @@
<date>1905</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="215">215.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="17" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -388,7 +386,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">J.S.</forename>
<surname>Mill</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -407,6 +404,7 @@
<date>1984</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="218">218.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="18" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -420,6 +418,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 12</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="para">para. 9.32.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="19" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -427,6 +426,7 @@
<ref>id.</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="para">para. 5.11.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="20" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">F.R.</forename>
<surname>Leavis</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -456,7 +455,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Bradney</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -474,7 +472,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Goodrich</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
‘
@@ -483,6 +480,7 @@
<ref>in Birks, op. cit., n. 1</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="59">p. 59.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="23" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -491,7 +489,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">S.</forename>
<surname>Turow</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -500,6 +497,7 @@
<date>1977</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="106">106.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="24" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -508,7 +506,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">O.</forename>
<surname>Kahn-Freund</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -522,6 +519,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="121">121,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 129.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="25" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -535,6 +533,7 @@
</author>
,
<ref>id.).</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="26" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -548,6 +547,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 20</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="120">p. 120.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="29" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -561,7 +561,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>King</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -590,6 +589,7 @@
<date>1947</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 256 and 257.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="31" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@
<date>1933</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="68">68.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="32" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -625,7 +626,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Johnstone</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
,
@@ -653,7 +653,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">W.</forename>
<surname>Conklin</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -664,6 +663,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="VII" to="VII">VII</biblScope>
<title level="j">Law and Critique</title>
<biblScope unit="page" from="173">173 at pp. 173–6.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="33" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -672,7 +672,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Collier</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -685,6 +684,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="427">427,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 429.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="34" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -693,7 +693,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>McAuslan</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -707,6 +706,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="1">1,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 8.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="35" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -727,6 +727,7 @@
<ref>op. cit, n. 32</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="71" to="5">pp. 71–5.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="38" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -738,6 +739,7 @@
</author>
,
<ref>op. cit., n. 22.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="39" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -746,7 +748,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Samuelson</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -759,6 +760,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="256">256,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 258.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="40" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -786,6 +788,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="38">38,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 46.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="41" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -806,6 +809,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="143">143,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 152.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="42" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -824,6 +828,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 40</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="at">at p. 54).</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="43" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -841,7 +846,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">N.</forename>
<surname>Whatley</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</forename>
,
@@ -867,7 +871,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">L.</forename>
<surname>Skwarok</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -880,6 +883,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="189">189,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 189.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="46" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -888,7 +892,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">N.</forename>
<surname>Bastin</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -901,6 +904,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="12">12,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 13.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="47" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -909,7 +913,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">A.</forename>
<surname>Ridley</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -922,6 +925,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="281">281,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 282.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="48" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -937,7 +941,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">T.</forename>
<surname>Vilkinas</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</surname>
, ‘
@@ -950,6 +953,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="246">246,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 248.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="49" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -963,6 +967,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 47</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="at">at p. 284.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="50" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -977,7 +982,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Birks</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -995,6 +999,7 @@
<date>1994</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="10" to="24">10–24.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="52" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1008,6 +1013,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 47</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="283">p. 283.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="53" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1027,6 +1033,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 48</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="248">p. 248.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="54" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1035,7 +1042,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">P.</forename>
<surname>Harris</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
, ‘
@@ -1048,6 +1054,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="110">110,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="at">at 112.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="55" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1061,6 +1068,7 @@
<ref>op. cit., n. 12</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="para">para 9.3.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="57" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1069,7 +1077,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">G.</forename>
<surname>Steiner</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1078,6 +1085,7 @@
<date>1997</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="20">20.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
</body>
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.xml b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.xml
index 9361e0327e97f94de0da8d2e3514b1cff4f7b0c7..a79a66ffaf0b0fd0cb117f711b8dee9c93d7130c 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.xml
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.xml
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
<date>1964</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="insbesondere">insbesondere S. 65—83.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="2" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@
<date>1978</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="66" to="85">S. 66-85.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="5" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -141,6 +143,7 @@
<date>1973</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="125">S. 125 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="6" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -154,6 +157,7 @@
<date>1976</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="insbesondere">insbesondere S. 170—183.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="7" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -167,6 +171,7 @@
<date>1980</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="99" to="112">S. 99—112.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="8" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -214,6 +219,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="64">S. 64 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="11" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -226,6 +232,7 @@
<date>1976</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="64">S. 64 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="12" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -251,7 +258,6 @@
<forename type="first">Statistisches</forename>
<forename type="middle">Bundesamt</forename>
<surname>Wiesbaden</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -284,6 +290,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="78">S. 78 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="15" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -303,6 +310,7 @@
<seg type="comment">berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation)</seg>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="90">S. 90 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="17" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -338,6 +346,7 @@
<date>1972</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="82">S. 82 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="18" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -387,6 +396,7 @@
<date>1976</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="113" to="128">S. 113-128.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="21" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -487,6 +497,7 @@
<date>1976</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="339" to="375">S. 339-375.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="26" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -505,6 +516,7 @@
<date>1980</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="138">S. 138.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="27" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -579,6 +591,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="102">S. 102 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="30" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -588,6 +601,7 @@
<date>1980</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="83" to="98">S. 83—98.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="31" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -617,6 +631,7 @@
<date>1980</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="24">S. 24 und S. 49.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="32" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -692,6 +707,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="78">S. 78 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="34" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -699,6 +715,7 @@
<ref>Ebenda</ref>
,
<citedRange unit="page" from="138" to="186">S. 138-186.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="35" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -770,7 +787,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">Rolf</forename>
<surname>Schumacher</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</forename>
,
@@ -974,7 +990,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">Sheldon</forename>
<surname>Messinger</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</forename>
,
@@ -1010,6 +1025,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="9," to="9,">vol. 9</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="675" to="694">pp. 675—694.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1053,6 +1069,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="9," to="9,">vol. 9</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="63" to="94">pp. 63—94.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1073,6 +1090,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="9," to="9,">vol. 9</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="695" to="706">pp. 695-706.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1092,6 +1110,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="9," to="9,">vol. 9</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="95" to="160">pp. 95—160.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1135,6 +1154,7 @@
<date>1976</date>
:
<title level="m">Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</title>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1278,6 +1298,7 @@
<title level="m">Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945.</title>
<publisher>Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin</publisher>
<idno>IIM-dp/79—104.</idno>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1292,7 +1313,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">Irmela</forename>
<surname>Gorges</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</forename>
,
@@ -1347,6 +1367,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="10," to="10,">vol. 10</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="339" to="375">pp. 339—375.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
<bibl>
<author>
@@ -1407,6 +1428,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="9," to="9,">vol. 9</biblScope>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="293" to="306">pp. 293-306.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</listBibl>
</body>
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
index 15af043b3f9056d4144aee8dba42370abc44b038..01585c4b8dd4738748ae84c546e9adb7c4ca7303 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-bibl/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="12">12 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="2" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -223,7 +224,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">3</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="3" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -250,7 +251,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Abel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="51">51 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="5" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -300,7 +301,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="75">75</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">83</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="6" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@
</author>
(
<ref>vorige N.) a.a.O.</ref>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="7" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -361,6 +363,7 @@
</persName>
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="171">171 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="8" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -399,7 +402,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="509">509</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">526</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="9" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -419,6 +422,7 @@
<date>1977</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="507">507 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="10" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -432,6 +436,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="175">175.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="11" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -566,6 +571,7 @@
<date>1967</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="375">375 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="12" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -583,6 +589,7 @@
<date>1977</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="137">137.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="13" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -636,7 +643,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="421">421</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">423</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="14" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -717,6 +724,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 8</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="115">115.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="15" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -738,7 +746,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="267">267</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">270 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="16" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -752,6 +760,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 5</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="80">80.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="17" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -779,7 +788,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="151">151</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">159</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="18" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -801,7 +810,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="81">81</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">89 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="19" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -819,6 +828,7 @@
<date>1972</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="188">188 N. 1.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="20" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -840,7 +850,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="305">305</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">330 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="21" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -855,6 +865,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 17</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="157">157 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="22" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -908,6 +919,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="163">163 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="23" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -918,7 +930,6 @@
<forename type="first">K.</forename>
<forename type="middle">H.</forename>
<surname>Neumayer</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -931,7 +942,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="45">45</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">48</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="24" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -957,6 +968,7 @@
</persName>
</editor>
<biblScope unit="page" from="56">56 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="25" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -971,6 +983,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 18</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="101">101 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="26" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -997,7 +1010,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="178">178</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">186 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="27" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1036,6 +1049,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 24</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="60">60.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="29" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1045,7 +1059,6 @@
<persName>
<forename type="first">R.</forename>
<surname>Abel</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1060,7 +1073,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="219">219</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">224 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="30" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1131,7 +1144,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="457">457</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">479</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="31" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1147,6 +1160,7 @@
<citedRange unit="page" from="15">15,</citedRange>
<citedRange unit="page" from="25">25 f.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="32" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1203,7 +1217,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="395">395</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">402 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="33" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1222,6 +1236,7 @@
<biblScope unit="volume" from="—23)" to="—23)">23</biblScope>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="5">5 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="34" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1239,6 +1254,7 @@
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="30">30 f.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="35" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1294,7 +1310,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="361">361</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">364 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="36" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1332,7 +1348,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="131">131</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">157 f.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="37" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1387,7 +1403,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="113">113</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">124 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="38" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1426,7 +1442,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="56">56</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">80</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="39" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1453,7 +1469,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="123">123</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">134 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="40" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1467,6 +1483,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="42">42.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="41" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1504,6 +1521,7 @@
<date>1977</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="40">40.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="43" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1566,6 +1584,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 37</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="197">197 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="45" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1596,6 +1615,7 @@
<date>1978</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="161">161 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="46" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1610,6 +1630,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 33</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="3">3 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="47" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1623,6 +1644,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 7</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="176">176.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="48" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1668,6 +1690,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 13</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="16">16 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="49" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1686,6 +1709,7 @@
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="70">70.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="50" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1751,6 +1775,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 4</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="58">58 ff.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="52" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1760,7 +1785,6 @@
<forename type="first">IDE-International</forename>
<forename type="middle">Research</forename>
<surname>Group</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</author>
,
@@ -1772,6 +1796,7 @@
<date>1980</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="Chapter">Chapter VIII.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="53" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1789,6 +1814,7 @@
</author>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="I" to="I">I</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="78">78.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="54" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1804,6 +1830,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 52</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="Chapter">Chapter VIII.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="55" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1855,6 +1882,7 @@
<date>1970</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="443">443 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="57" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1887,7 +1915,6 @@
<forename type="first">H.</forename>
<forename type="middle">M.</forename>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
- ,
</persName>
</editor>
,
@@ -1897,6 +1924,7 @@
<date>1978</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="97">97 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="58" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1915,6 +1943,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="362">362 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="59" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1938,6 +1967,7 @@
</persName>
</author>
<biblScope unit="page" from="167">167 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="60" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -1965,7 +1995,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="95">95</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">101</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="61" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2026,6 +2056,7 @@
<citedRange unit="page" from="235">235 f.,</citedRange>
<citedRange unit="page" from="242">242.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="63" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2045,6 +2076,7 @@
<date>1978</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="221">221 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="64" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2156,6 +2188,7 @@
<date>1975</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="196">196 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="66" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2177,7 +2210,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="85">85</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">88 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="67" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2229,7 +2262,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="101">101</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">126</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="68" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2247,6 +2280,7 @@
<ref>vorige N.</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="65">65 (84 ff.).</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="69" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2275,7 +2309,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="405">405</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">414 f.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="70" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2314,6 +2348,7 @@
<date>1976</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="37">37 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="72" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2328,6 +2363,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 69</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="407">407.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="73" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2354,7 +2390,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="151">151</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">152</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="74" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2408,6 +2444,7 @@
<ref>oben N. 52</ref>
)
<citedRange unit="page" from="Chapter">Chapter I.</citedRange>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="75" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2435,7 +2472,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="97">97</biblScope>
(
<citedRange unit="page">99 ff.</citedRange>
- )
+ ).
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="76" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2454,6 +2491,7 @@
<date>1973</date>
)
<biblScope unit="page" from="403">403 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="77" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2471,6 +2509,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
,
<biblScope unit="page" from="377">377 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
<note n="78" type="footnote" place="bottom">
@@ -2490,6 +2529,7 @@
<date>1979</date>
),
<biblScope unit="page" from="159">159 ff.</biblScope>
+ .
</bibl>
</note>
</body>
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-check-manual-corrections.ipynb b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-check-manual-corrections.ipynb
index f8bd852d2d2db4e3f2fae19588d3936e9c0c44b8..163b3008528e545ed0e950e7dcd8027ddacd3c8b 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-check-manual-corrections.ipynb
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-check-manual-corrections.ipynb
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
{
"metadata": {
"ExecuteTime": {
- "end_time": "2024-10-02T16:08:33.142511Z",
- "start_time": "2024-10-02T16:08:32.856033Z"
+ "end_time": "2024-10-03T06:18:24.623658Z",
+ "start_time": "2024-10-03T06:18:24.299628Z"
}
},
"cell_type": "code",
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
"output_type": "display_data"
}
],
- "execution_count": 16
+ "execution_count": 3
},
{
"metadata": {
diff --git a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-to-bibformats.ipynb b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-to-bibformats.ipynb
index 8b0d7e4f9d93c0e0e8e2bce9e136a6bd1765df8c..b286444ab30ca985f1ae2ddfe6ecba566ed922e5 100644
--- a/convert-anystyle-data/tei-to-bibformats.ipynb
+++ b/convert-anystyle-data/tei-to-bibformats.ipynb
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@
{
"metadata": {
"ExecuteTime": {
- "end_time": "2024-09-30T07:54:37.231679800Z",
- "start_time": "2024-09-30T07:54:36.583982200Z"
+ "end_time": "2024-10-03T06:19:20.355351Z",
+ "start_time": "2024-10-03T06:19:19.736101Z"
}
},
"cell_type": "code",
@@ -151,22 +151,19 @@
"id": "6228841009ae6c5f",
"outputs": [
{
- "ename": "FileNotFoundError",
- "evalue": "[WinError 2] Das System kann die angegebene Datei nicht finden",
+ "ename": "RuntimeError",
+ "evalue": "Error: Unable to access jarfile lib\\SaxonHE12-5\\saxon-he-12.5.jar\n",
"output_type": "error",
"traceback": [
"\u001B[1;31m---------------------------------------------------------------------------\u001B[0m",
- "\u001B[1;31mFileNotFoundError\u001B[0m Traceback (most recent call last)",
- "Cell \u001B[1;32mIn[3], line 2\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 1\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mfrom\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;21;01mlib\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;21;01m.\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;21;01mxslt\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;28;01mimport\u001B[39;00m transform\n\u001B[1;32m----> 2\u001B[0m transform(xslt_path\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mlib/xslt/convert_tei-to-biblstruct_bibl.xsl\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \n\u001B[0;32m 3\u001B[0m input_path\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mtei-bibl-corrected\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m,\n\u001B[0;32m 4\u001B[0m output_path\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mtei-biblStruct\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \n\u001B[0;32m 5\u001B[0m rename_extension\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m(\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m-bibl_biblStruct.TEIP5.xml\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m,\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m.biblStruct.xml\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m))\n",
- "File \u001B[1;32m~\\DataspellProjects\\experiments\\convert-anystyle-data\\lib\\xslt.py:12\u001B[0m, in \u001B[0;36mtransform\u001B[1;34m(xslt_path, input_path, output_path, rename_extension, remove_prefix)\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 8\u001B[0m xslt_path \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m os\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mpath\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mnormpath(xslt_path)\n\u001B[0;32m 9\u001B[0m cmd \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m [\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mjava\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m-jar\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mlib/SaxonHE12-5J/saxon-he-12.5.jar\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m,\n\u001B[0;32m 10\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;124mf\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m-s:\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;132;01m{\u001B[39;00minput_path\u001B[38;5;132;01m}\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \u001B[38;5;124mf\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m-xsl:\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;132;01m{\u001B[39;00mxslt_path\u001B[38;5;132;01m}\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \u001B[38;5;124mf\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m-o:\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;132;01m{\u001B[39;00moutput_path\u001B[38;5;132;01m}\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;124m/\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m,\n\u001B[0;32m 11\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mp_target-language=de\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mp_github-action=true\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m, \u001B[38;5;124mf\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mp_output-folder=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;132;01m{\u001B[39;00moutput_path\u001B[38;5;132;01m}\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;124m/\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m]\n\u001B[1;32m---> 12\u001B[0m process \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m subprocess\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mrun(cmd, capture_output\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;28;01mTrue\u001B[39;00m, text\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;28;01mTrue\u001B[39;00m)\n\u001B[0;32m 14\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# clean up the output dir\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 15\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mfor\u001B[39;00m file_path \u001B[38;5;129;01min\u001B[39;00m glob(\u001B[38;5;124mf\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;132;01m{\u001B[39;00moutput_path\u001B[38;5;132;01m}\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;124m/*.xml\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m):\n",
- "File \u001B[1;32m~\\AppData\\Local\\miniconda3\\Lib\\subprocess.py:548\u001B[0m, in \u001B[0;36mrun\u001B[1;34m(input, capture_output, timeout, check, *popenargs, **kwargs)\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 545\u001B[0m kwargs[\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mstdout\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m] \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m PIPE\n\u001B[0;32m 546\u001B[0m kwargs[\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124mstderr\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m] \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m PIPE\n\u001B[1;32m--> 548\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mwith\u001B[39;00m Popen(\u001B[38;5;241m*\u001B[39mpopenargs, \u001B[38;5;241m*\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m*\u001B[39mkwargs) \u001B[38;5;28;01mas\u001B[39;00m process:\n\u001B[0;32m 549\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mtry\u001B[39;00m:\n\u001B[0;32m 550\u001B[0m stdout, stderr \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m process\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mcommunicate(\u001B[38;5;28minput\u001B[39m, timeout\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39mtimeout)\n",
- "File \u001B[1;32m~\\AppData\\Local\\miniconda3\\Lib\\subprocess.py:1026\u001B[0m, in \u001B[0;36mPopen.__init__\u001B[1;34m(self, args, bufsize, executable, stdin, stdout, stderr, preexec_fn, close_fds, shell, cwd, env, universal_newlines, startupinfo, creationflags, restore_signals, start_new_session, pass_fds, user, group, extra_groups, encoding, errors, text, umask, pipesize, process_group)\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 1022\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mif\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mtext_mode:\n\u001B[0;32m 1023\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mstderr \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m io\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mTextIOWrapper(\u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mstderr,\n\u001B[0;32m 1024\u001B[0m encoding\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39mencoding, errors\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39merrors)\n\u001B[1;32m-> 1026\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39m_execute_child(args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds,\n\u001B[0;32m 1027\u001B[0m pass_fds, cwd, env,\n\u001B[0;32m 1028\u001B[0m startupinfo, creationflags, shell,\n\u001B[0;32m 1029\u001B[0m p2cread, p2cwrite,\n\u001B[0;32m 1030\u001B[0m c2pread, c2pwrite,\n\u001B[0;32m 1031\u001B[0m errread, errwrite,\n\u001B[0;32m 1032\u001B[0m restore_signals,\n\u001B[0;32m 1033\u001B[0m gid, gids, uid, umask,\n\u001B[0;32m 1034\u001B[0m start_new_session, process_group)\n\u001B[0;32m 1035\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mexcept\u001B[39;00m:\n\u001B[0;32m 1036\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# Cleanup if the child failed starting.\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 1037\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mfor\u001B[39;00m f \u001B[38;5;129;01min\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;28mfilter\u001B[39m(\u001B[38;5;28;01mNone\u001B[39;00m, (\u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mstdin, \u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mstdout, \u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mstderr)):\n",
- "File \u001B[1;32m~\\AppData\\Local\\miniconda3\\Lib\\subprocess.py:1538\u001B[0m, in \u001B[0;36mPopen._execute_child\u001B[1;34m(self, args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds, pass_fds, cwd, env, startupinfo, creationflags, shell, p2cread, p2cwrite, c2pread, c2pwrite, errread, errwrite, unused_restore_signals, unused_gid, unused_gids, unused_uid, unused_umask, unused_start_new_session, unused_process_group)\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 1536\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# Start the process\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 1537\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mtry\u001B[39;00m:\n\u001B[1;32m-> 1538\u001B[0m hp, ht, pid, tid \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m _winapi\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mCreateProcess(executable, args,\n\u001B[0;32m 1539\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# no special security\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 1540\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mNone\u001B[39;00m, \u001B[38;5;28;01mNone\u001B[39;00m,\n\u001B[0;32m 1541\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28mint\u001B[39m(\u001B[38;5;129;01mnot\u001B[39;00m close_fds),\n\u001B[0;32m 1542\u001B[0m creationflags,\n\u001B[0;32m 1543\u001B[0m env,\n\u001B[0;32m 1544\u001B[0m cwd,\n\u001B[0;32m 1545\u001B[0m startupinfo)\n\u001B[0;32m 1546\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mfinally\u001B[39;00m:\n\u001B[0;32m 1547\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# Child is launched. Close the parent's copy of those pipe\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 1548\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# handles that only the child should have open. You need\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[1;32m (...)\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 1551\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# pipe will not close when the child process exits and the\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 1552\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# ReadFile will hang.\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 1553\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28mself\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39m_close_pipe_fds(p2cread, p2cwrite,\n\u001B[0;32m 1554\u001B[0m c2pread, c2pwrite,\n\u001B[0;32m 1555\u001B[0m errread, errwrite)\n",
- "\u001B[1;31mFileNotFoundError\u001B[0m: [WinError 2] Das System kann die angegebene Datei nicht finden"
+ "\u001B[1;31mRuntimeError\u001B[0m Traceback (most recent call last)",
+ "Cell \u001B[1;32mIn[1], line 2\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 1\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mfrom\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;21;01mlib\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;21;01m.\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;21;01mxslt\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;28;01mimport\u001B[39;00m transform\n\u001B[1;32m----> 2\u001B[0m \u001B[43mtransform\u001B[49m\u001B[43m(\u001B[49m\u001B[43mxslt_path\u001B[49m\u001B[38;5;241;43m=\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43mlib/xslt/convert_tei-to-biblstruct_bibl.xsl\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[43m,\u001B[49m\u001B[43m \u001B[49m\n\u001B[0;32m 3\u001B[0m \u001B[43m \u001B[49m\u001B[43minput_path\u001B[49m\u001B[38;5;241;43m=\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43mtei-bibl-corrected\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[43m,\u001B[49m\n\u001B[0;32m 4\u001B[0m \u001B[43m \u001B[49m\u001B[43moutput_path\u001B[49m\u001B[38;5;241;43m=\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43mtei-biblStruct\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[43m,\u001B[49m\u001B[43m \u001B[49m\n\u001B[0;32m 5\u001B[0m \u001B[43m \u001B[49m\u001B[43mrename_extension\u001B[49m\u001B[38;5;241;43m=\u001B[39;49m\u001B[43m(\u001B[49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m-bibl_biblStruct.TEIP5.xml\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[43m,\u001B[49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m.biblStruct.xml\u001B[39;49m\u001B[38;5;124;43m'\u001B[39;49m\u001B[43m)\u001B[49m\u001B[43m)\u001B[49m\n",
+ "File \u001B[1;32m~\\DataspellProjects\\experiments\\convert-anystyle-data\\lib\\xslt.py:17\u001B[0m, in \u001B[0;36mtransform\u001B[1;34m(xslt_path, input_path, output_path, rename_extension)\u001B[0m\n\u001B[0;32m 15\u001B[0m process \u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m subprocess\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mrun(cmd, capture_output\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;28;01mTrue\u001B[39;00m, text\u001B[38;5;241m=\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;28;01mTrue\u001B[39;00m)\n\u001B[0;32m 16\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mif\u001B[39;00m process\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mreturncode \u001B[38;5;241m!=\u001B[39m \u001B[38;5;241m0\u001B[39m:\n\u001B[1;32m---> 17\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mraise\u001B[39;00m \u001B[38;5;167;01mRuntimeError\u001B[39;00m(process\u001B[38;5;241m.\u001B[39mstderr)\n\u001B[0;32m 19\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;66;03m# clean up the output dir\u001B[39;00m\n\u001B[0;32m 20\u001B[0m \u001B[38;5;28;01mfor\u001B[39;00m file_path \u001B[38;5;129;01min\u001B[39;00m glob(\u001B[38;5;124mf\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;132;01m{\u001B[39;00moutput_path\u001B[38;5;132;01m}\u001B[39;00m\u001B[38;5;124m/*.xml\u001B[39m\u001B[38;5;124m'\u001B[39m):\n",
+ "\u001B[1;31mRuntimeError\u001B[0m: Error: Unable to access jarfile lib\\SaxonHE12-5\\saxon-he-12.5.jar\n"
]
}
],
- "execution_count": 3
+ "execution_count": 1
},
{
"metadata": {},
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html
index 6be7f7041ca872a8584ac35287be541c2619ef4b..67db8b053d39ce98cbf696e6aef12300c6a17230 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html
@@ -21,86 +21,86 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to0__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to20__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl\10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms,<span class="diff_add">,</span> A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right<span class="diff_sub"> [1785]</span>’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6, s. 146.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6, s. 146.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘“The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘“The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A<span class="diff_chg">.).</span> The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg"> see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A<span class="diff_chg"> .).</span> The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg">see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74; R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74; R. Collier,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah,<span class="diff_add">,</span> An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__4"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Balfour <span class="diff_sub">v. </span>Balfour [1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Balfour Balfour <span class="diff_add">v. </span>[1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">Jr.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth.)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__6"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, P. Parkinson<span class="diff_chg">, and</span> J. Behrens, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue, <span class="diff_chg">Jr.,</span> ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, P. Parkinson<span class="diff_chg"> and</span> J. Behrens,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue, <span class="diff_chg">.,</span> ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24; B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185, per Brown-Wilkinson L</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24; B. Fehlberg,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185, per Brown-Wilkinson L</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34; M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34; M. Richardson,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52, and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52, and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The<span class="diff_sub"> Hon.</span> Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to0__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave, ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to0__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave, ‘Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission,<span class="diff_add">,</span> De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from0_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to0_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__2"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right<span class="diff_sub"> [1785]</span>’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6, s. 146.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6, s. 146.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘“The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘“The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A<span class="diff_chg">.).</span> The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg"> see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A<span class="diff_chg"> .).</span> The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg">see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74; R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74; R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Balfour <span class="diff_sub">v. </span>Balfour [1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Balfour Balfour <span class="diff_add">v. </span>[1919] 2 K.B. 571.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">Jr.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth.)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z<span class="diff_add"> </span>.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, P. Parkinson<span class="diff_chg">, and</span> J. Behrens, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue<span class="diff_chg">, Jr.,</span> ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, P. Parkinson<span class="diff_chg"> and</span> J. Behrens, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24; B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185, per Brown-Wilkinson L</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24; B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185, per Brown-Wilkinson L</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34; M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34; M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52, and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52, and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The<span class="diff_sub"> Hon.</span> Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave<span class="diff_sub">,</span> ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave ‘Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to20__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service, The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to20__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from20_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to20_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html
index 1f2eef4714a8363457123b44d5bdf04be0201703..bf53d738c2ad71936242b19ec8af0d82396f5c84 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html
@@ -21,61 +21,61 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to1__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to21__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl\10.1111_1467-6478.00080.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__0"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg"> . . .</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg"> . .</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg">. ..</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg">..</span> .’. A. Dicey,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Law of Contract (1989)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470, at 485 and 481.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470, at 485 and 481.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from<span class="diff_sub"> Lady</span> Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9, recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd. 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31).<span class="diff_sub"> This has yet to happen.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9, recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd. 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31)<span class="diff_add"> This has yet to happen</span>.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 <span class="diff_sub">National </span>Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. <span class="diff_sub">13 </span>ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15, at 24–6).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15, at 24–6).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__1"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 J. MacFarlane, M. Jeeves<span class="diff_sub">,</span> and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835, at 836.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 J. MacFarlane, M. Jeeves and A. Boon,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835, at 836.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich, ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks, op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich, ‘Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks, op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow,<span class="diff_add">,</span> One L (1977) 106.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121, at 129.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121, at 129.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th <span class="diff_sub">ed</span>., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th ., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__4"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone,<span class="diff_add">,</span> The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427, at 429.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427, at 429.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1, at 8.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1, at 8.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256, at 258.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256, at 258.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38, at 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38, at 46.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143, at 152.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143, at 152.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer<span class="diff_sub">,</span> and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer and N. Whatley,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189, at 189.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189, at 189.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12, at 13.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12, at 13.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281, at 282.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281, at 282.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246, at 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246, at 248.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to1__10"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110, at 112.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris,<span class="diff_add">,</span> ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110, at 112.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from1_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to1__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to1_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to21__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg"> . . .</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg"> . .</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg">. ..</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg">..</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470, at 485 and 481.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470, at 485 and 481.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from<span class="diff_sub"> Lady</span> Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9, recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd. 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31).<span class="diff_sub"> This has yet to happen.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9, recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd. 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31)<span class="diff_add"> This has yet to happen</span>.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 <span class="diff_sub">National </span>Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. <span class="diff_sub">13 </span>ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. ACLEC, id., para 4.6.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15, at 24–6).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15, at 24–6).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 J. MacFarlane, M. Jeeves<span class="diff_sub">,</span> and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835, at 836.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 J. MacFarlane, M. Jeeves and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835, at 836.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to21__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich<span class="diff_sub">,</span> ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks, op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich ‘Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks, op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to21__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121, at 129.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121, at 129.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th <span class="diff_sub">ed</span>., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th ., 1947) at 256 and 257.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427, at 429.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427, at 429.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1, at 8.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1, at 8.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256, at 258.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256, at 258.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to21__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38, at 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38, at 46.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143, at 152.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143, at 152.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer<span class="diff_sub">,</span> and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189, at 189.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189, at 189.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to21__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12, at 13.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12, at 13.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281, at 282.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281, at 282.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246, at 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246, at 248.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to21__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110, at 112.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110, at 112.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from21_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to21_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html
index d0cfcb1392c05744c0d790c991ce3ca0c9104c7b..675f4eaa9f0da54a719effb48c790b49a32e179b 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html
@@ -21,75 +21,75 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to2__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to22__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl\10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__0"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über<span class="diff_sub"> </span>,Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine', 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über,<span class="diff_add"> </span>Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine<span class="diff_add"> </span>', 1976.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur 'Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel 'Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black 1973, S. 125 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black 1973, S. 125 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__1"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75, der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75, der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__2"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.; Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 82 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.; Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 82 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg">'</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner; Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,<span class="diff_sub"> </span>% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg"> ‘</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner; Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärtei 1976, S. 113-128.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärtei 1976, S. 113-128.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">'</span>. (Blankenburg; Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>. (Blankenburg; Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff, vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89, Fn. 17,</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff, vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89, Fn. 17,</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35; Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35; Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.; sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.; sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">'</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">' </span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__6"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, <span class="diff_add">, </span>1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__8"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, <span class="diff_sub">unter Mitarbeit von Ralf Rogowski, </span>1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome<span class="diff_chg">; Jan Howard</span> und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome<span class="diff_chg">-</span> und Sheldon Messinger, <span class="diff_add">, </span>1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75<span class="diff_chg">:</span> Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75<span class="diff_chg">;</span> Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F<span class="diff_add"> </span>., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F<span class="diff_add"> </span>., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rijn.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/Rijn.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to2__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges,<span class="diff_add"> ,</span> 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to2__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E<span class="diff_add"> </span>., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from2_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to2_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__0"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über<span class="diff_sub"> </span>,Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine', 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über,<span class="diff_add"> </span>Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine<span class="diff_add"> </span>', 1976.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur 'Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel 'Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__1"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black 1973, S. 125 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black 1973, S. 125 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75, der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75, der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.; Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 82 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.; Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 82 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg">'</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner; Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,<span class="diff_sub"> </span>% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg"> ‘</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner; Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärtei 1976, S. 113-128.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärtei 1976, S. 113-128.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">'</span>. (Blankenburg; Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>. (Blankenburg; Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff, vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89, Fn. 17,</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff, vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89, Fn. 17,</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35; Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35; Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.; sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.; sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz; Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">'</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">' </span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__10"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, <span class="diff_sub">unter Mitarbeit von Ralf Rogowski, </span>1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome<span class="diff_chg">; Jan Howard</span> und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome<span class="diff_chg">-</span> und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75<span class="diff_chg">:</span> Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75<span class="diff_chg">;</span> Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__11"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F<span class="diff_add"> </span>., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F<span class="diff_add"> </span>., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rijn.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/Rijn.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__13"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to22__14"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to22__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E<span class="diff_add"> </span>., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from22_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to22_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html
index 2772bf706bc2631cee3f2294a0ab8e7ff04bc0d0..b8eea14078ba050b5a94387e6360b15e91e3d3e4 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-anystyle-tei/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html
@@ -21,90 +21,90 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to3__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to23__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl\10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__2"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences <span class="diff_sub">(</span>Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976)<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976); Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__3"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.): Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.) Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff.</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18)<span class="diff_chg">. Auch der</span> Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18)<span class="diff_chg"> Auch der</span> Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">13 Smelser 2 f. ; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.). - Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.) Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423)</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl<span class="diff_chg">,</span> 1969) 514 (520 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> 1969) 514 (520 ff.) — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240) Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979<span class="diff_sub"> </span>/1 S. 23 (31 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">. -</span> Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979/1 S. 23 (31 ff.) Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —23) 5 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —<span class="diff_add"> </span>23) 5 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.) Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__13"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185) Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__14"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg"> , der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg">, der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data<span class="diff_add"> </span>". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__15"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979<span class="diff_add"> </span>— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__16"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__17"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg"> und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“<span class="diff_sub"> </span>wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg">und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__18"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__17">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__17">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -<span class="diff_add"> </span>8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__19"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__18">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__18">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group,<span class="diff_add">,</span> Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__20"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__19">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33. Rechtsvergleicbung und vergleichende Recbtssoxiologie 79</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__19">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__21"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__20">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson,<span class="diff_chg"> Social System and Legal</span> Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__20">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson,<span class="diff_chg">, Social System and Legal</span> Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__22"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__21">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101)<span class="diff_sub"> ff.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__21">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__22">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (<span class="diff_sub"> </span>oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__22">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__23"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__23">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.<span class="diff_sub"> Rechtsvergleichung und vergleichende Rechtssoziologie 81</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__23">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Siehe auch Ziegen<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.) — Siehe auch Ziegen Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology <span class="diff_sub"> </span>1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology 1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__24"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__24">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__24">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor<span class="diff_add"> </span>schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to3__25"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son<span class="diff_chg"> derheft</span> 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son<span class="diff_chg">derheft</span> 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__25">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__25">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to3__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from3_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to3_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences <span class="diff_sub">(</span>Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976)<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976); Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__3"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.): Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.) Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff..</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18)<span class="diff_chg">. Auch der</span> Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18)<span class="diff_chg"> Auch der</span> Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.). - Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.) Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl<span class="diff_chg">,</span> 1969) 514 (520 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> 1969) 514 (520 ff.) — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__6"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__7"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240) Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979<span class="diff_sub"> </span>/1 S. 23 (31 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">. -</span> Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979/1 S. 23 (31 ff.) Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —23) 5 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —<span class="diff_add"> </span>23) 5 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.) Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185) Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg"> , der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg">, der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data<span class="diff_add"> </span>". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979<span class="diff_add"> </span>— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg"> und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“<span class="diff_sub"> </span>wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg">und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -<span class="diff_add"> </span>8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__13"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__14"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101)<span class="diff_sub"> ff</span>.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (<span class="diff_sub"> </span>oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__15"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.<span class="diff_sub"> Rechtsvergleichung und vergleichende Rechtssoziologie 81</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Siehe auch Ziegen<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.) — Siehe auch Ziegen Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology <span class="diff_sub"> </span>1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology 1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to23__16"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor<span class="diff_add"> </span>schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son<span class="diff_chg"> derheft</span> 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son<span class="diff_chg">derheft</span> 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to23__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from23_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to23_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html
index 85f87260ab1b6194631140c1c6408d4881313dca..2fcb3cde08ee4038864e6ba5accd36699a412cc1 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.diff.html
@@ -21,86 +21,86 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to60__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to8__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl-corrected\10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__0"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right [1785]’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6<span class="diff_sub">,</span> s. 146.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right [1785]’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6 s. 146.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__1"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__3"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘<span class="diff_chg">“</span>The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘<span class="diff_chg">"</span>The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A.). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg"> see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A.). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg">see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74<span class="diff_sub">;</span> R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74 R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C.<span class="diff_chg">,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C.<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Balfour <span class="diff_sub">v. Balfour </span>[1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29<span class="diff_add"> V.</span> Balfour [1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">Jr.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth.)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, <span class="diff_sub">P. Parkinson, and J. Behrens, </span>Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue,<span class="diff_sub"> Jr.,</span> ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see<span class="diff_add"> P. Parkinson</span> S. Parker<span class="diff_add"> and J. Behrens</span>, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue, ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990)<span class="diff_add">,</span> especially 223 ff</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24<span class="diff_sub">;</span> B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185<span class="diff_sub">,</span> per Brown-Wilkinson L</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185 per Brown-Wilkinson L<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34<span class="diff_chg">;</span> M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34<span class="diff_chg">.</span> M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 (1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 (1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 (1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 (1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__10"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52<span class="diff_sub">,</span> and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52 and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The<span class="diff_sub"> Hon.</span> Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to60__13"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave<span class="diff_sub">,</span> ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave ‘Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to60__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C<span class="diff_add">.</span> 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service<span class="diff_sub">,</span> The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from60_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to60_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__0"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 A. Phillips, ‘Citizenship and Feminist Politics’ in Citizenship, ed. G. Andrews (1991) 77.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 T. Brennan and C. Pateman, ‘“Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth”: Women and the Origins of Liberalism’ (1979) 27 Political Studies 183.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman’s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 I have explored the gendered nature of citizenship at greater length in two complementary papers: ‘Embodying the Citizen’ in Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates, ed. M. Thornton (1995) and ‘Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises’ (1996) 20 Melbourne University Law Rev. 1072.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 S. Walby, ‘Is Citizenship Gendered?’ (1994) 28 Sociology 379</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right [1785]’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6<span class="diff_sub">,</span> s. 146.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 I. Kant, ‘Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right [1785]’ in The Metaphysics of Morals (trans. M. Gregor, 1991) 125–6 s. 146.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 U. Vogel, ‘Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship’ in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 N. Fraser and L. Gordon, ‘Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?’ in id., p. 97.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765–69, 1979) 442.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80–1.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 A. Bottomley, ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’ (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 D. West, ‘Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power’ (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__1"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, ‘Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes’ (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (1977) 160.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women’s Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (1990) 4, 220.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__3"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘<span class="diff_chg">“</span>The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, ‘<span class="diff_chg">"</span>The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy’ (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O’Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43–59.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A.). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg"> see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A.). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (<span class="diff_chg">see</span> R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74<span class="diff_sub">;</span> R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 M. Freeman, ‘Contracting in the Haven: Balfour v. Balfour Revisited’ in Exploring the Boundaries of Contract, ed. R. Halson (1996) 74 R. Collier, Masculinity, Law and the Family (1995) 127 and throughout. See Collier further for a comprehensive study of sexuality in marriage.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C.<span class="diff_chg">,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C.<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, ‘Private Ordering in Family Law – Will Women Benefit?’ in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, ‘An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine’ (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Balfour <span class="diff_sub">v. Balfour </span>[1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29<span class="diff_add"> V.</span> Balfour [1919] 2 K.B. 571.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">Jr.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan <span class="diff_chg">.,</span> Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth.)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 For example, Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 (U.K.); Domestic Relations Act 1975 (N.Z.); Marriage Act Amendment Act 1976 (Cwth.)</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__5"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Compare U. Vogel, ‘Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?’ in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 See, for example, Bradwell v. Illinois 83 U.S. (16 Wall) 130 (1873).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see S. Parker, <span class="diff_sub">P. Parkinson, and J. Behrens, </span>Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue,<span class="diff_sub"> Jr.,</span> ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see<span class="diff_add"> P. Parkinson</span> S. Parker<span class="diff_add"> and J. Behrens</span>, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, ‘Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage’ (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue, ‘What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 The legal construction of masculinity and femininity in family law has been the subject of recent scholarly interest. Notable examples are O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 21 and Collier, op. cit., n. 24.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 For discussion of sex and legal subjecthood, see N. Naffine ‘Sexing the Subject (of Law)’ in Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990) especially 223 ff<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990)<span class="diff_add">,</span> especially 223 ff</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 For example, N. Howell, ‘“Sexually Transmitted Debt”: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers’ (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 P. Baron, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt’ (1995) 13 Law in Context 23.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24<span class="diff_sub">;</span> B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185<span class="diff_sub">,</span> per Brown-Wilkinson L</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 id., p. 24 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Rev. 467, 468. See, also, Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180, at 185 per Brown-Wilkinson L<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34<span class="diff_chg">;</span> M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Baron, op. cit., n. 44, p. 34<span class="diff_chg">.</span> M. Richardson, ‘Protecting Women who provide Security for a Husband’s, Partner’s or Child’s Debts. The Value and Limits of an Economic Perspective’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 368.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to ‘rougher than usual handling’ to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 B. Fehlberg, ‘The Husband, the Bank, the Wife and Her Signature – the Sequel’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Rev. 675.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia (1996) 39 N.S.W.L.R. 577 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 (1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 (1991) 25 N.S.W.L.R. 32 (C.A.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 (1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 (1994) A.S.C. 56–268 (N.S.W.C.A.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__10"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52<span class="diff_sub">,</span> and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwth.), s. 52 and the Contracts Review Act 1980 (N.S.W.). 54 (1994) A.S.C. 56–270 (N.S.W.C.A.)</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 A number of recent English cases have also turned on the question of whether the wife received independent legal advice. The House of Lords considered the issue in Barclays Bank v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. See, also, Banco Exterior Internacional v. Mann [1995] 1 All E.R. 936.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Compare K. O’Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112–18.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Although Reich’s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of ‘new property’ has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, ‘The New Property’ (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 <span class="diff_sub">(</span>1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, ‘Property Rights and Third Party Creditors – the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines’ (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 For discussion, see J. Riley, ‘The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v. Bryant’ (1994) 16 Sydney Law Rev. 412.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The<span class="diff_sub"> Hon.</span> Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, ‘When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide’ (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 B. Bennett, ‘The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family’ (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 O’Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850–1895 (1989) 46.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to8__13"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave<span class="diff_sub">,</span> ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the ‘artificiality’ of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave ‘Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability’ in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262–4.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, ‘Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 C. Colebrook, ‘Feminist Ethics and Historicism’ (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Compare K. O’Donovan, ‘Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?’ (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431–3.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to8__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W<span class="diff_add"> </span>.). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C<span class="diff_add">.</span> 307 (1995); C. Overington, ‘Why can’t They Marry?’ The Age, 26 April 1997.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service<span class="diff_sub">,</span> The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 id., p. 3.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from8_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to8_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Above, n. 30.</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html
index 09fcd28c6d904f8669f14d20ba18cad6bc3477e8..746cacee38739edc18c8a69708b3793eed1d4174 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.diff.html
@@ -21,61 +21,61 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to61__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to9__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1111_1467-6478.00080.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl-corrected\10.1111_1467-6478.00080.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg"> . . .</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg"> . .</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg">. ..</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg">..</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 485 and 481.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470 at 485 and 481.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Lady Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9<span class="diff_sub">,</span> recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd<span class="diff_sub">.</span> 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31). This has yet to happen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Lady Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9 recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31). This has yet to happen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 <span class="diff_sub">National </span>Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. <span class="diff_sub">13 </span>ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15<span class="diff_chg">, at</span> 24–6).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15<span class="diff_chg"> at</span> 24–6).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 J. MacFarlane<span class="diff_sub">, M. Jeeves,</span> and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 836.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 <span class="diff_add">M. Jeeves, </span>J. MacFarlane and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835 at 836.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__5"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich<span class="diff_sub">,</span> ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks<span class="diff_sub">,</span> op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich ‘Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 129.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121 at 129.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">25 Kahn-Freund believed that both doctrinal and non-doctrinal learning were possible together though he did concede that in the doctrinal method there was ‘the danger that the discussion gets stuck in the perhaps intellectually very fascinating game of legal argument.. .’ (Kahn-Freund, id.).</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17<span class="diff_add"> </span>.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th <span class="diff_sub">ed</span>., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th ., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 429.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427 at 429.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 8.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1 at 8.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 258.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256 at 258.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38 at 46.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 152.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143 at 152.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer, and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">43 T. Mortimer, P. Leighton and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995).</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 189.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189 at 189.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 13.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12 at 13.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 282.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281 at 282.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246 at 248.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to61__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 112.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to61__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110 at 112.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from61_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to61_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 For a contrary view, see G. Jones, ‘“Traditional” Legal Scholarship: a Personal View’ in What Are Law Schools For?, ed. P. Birks (1996) 14.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg"> . . .</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg"> . .</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 R. Goff, ‘The Search for Principle’ (1983) Proceeedings of the British Academy 169, at 171. This is an amplification of Dicey’s remark that ‘[b]y adequate study and careful thought whole departments of law can<span class="diff_chg">. ..</span> be reduced to order and exhibited under the form of a few principles which sum up the effect of a hundred cases<span class="diff_chg">..</span> .’. A. Dicey, Can English Law be taught at the Universities? (1883) 20.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 J. Smith, The Law of Contract (1989)</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 See, for example, D. Kennedy, ‘Form and substance in Private Law Ajudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Rev. 1685.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 485 and 481.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 B. Hepple, ‘The Renewal of the Liberal Law Degree’ (1996) Cambridge Law J. 470 at 485 and 481.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 P.A. Thomas, ‘Introduction’ in Socio-Legal Studies, ed. P.A. Thomas (1997) 19.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 R. Cotterrell, Law’s Community (1995) 296.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Socio-legal studies has been defined in many different ways. In this essay the term is taken to indicate the use of ideas ‘from other disciplines primarily but not exclusively from within the social science and humanities fields’. S. Wheeler, ‘Company Law’ in Thomas, op. cit., n. 8, at p. 285.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Lady Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9<span class="diff_sub">,</span> recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd<span class="diff_sub">.</span> 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31). This has yet to happen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Some fail wholly. It is difficult to see any effect on academic legal education that resulted from Lady Marre’s report A Time for Change (1988). The Jarratt report on universities produced for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (CVCP), Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency studies in Universities (1988), produced much comment but little action. Even those that are thought of as being a success are not wholly implemented. Despite Ormrod’s recommendations no Institute of Profesional Legal Studies was set up and the universities and colleges of higher education did not take sole responsibility for vocational legal training (Report of the Committee on Legal Education (1971; Cmnd 4595) ch. 9 recs. 40 and 23). There were also other recommendations that were not implemented. The Robbins report on higher education, Higher Education (1963; Cmnd 2154) took it is axiomatic that ‘courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue them and wish to do so’ (para. 31). This has yet to happen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 <span class="diff_sub">National </span>Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. <span class="diff_sub">13 </span>ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Higher Education in the learning society (1997) (the Dearing report); ACLEC, First Report on Legal Education and Training (1996). The Government’s White Paper on further and higher education had not been published at the time of writing this essay. ACLEC, id., para 4.6.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15<span class="diff_chg">, at</span> 24–6).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 ACLEC’s proposal is part of an historical process which has gradually seen English university law schools distance themselves from the legal professions and the legal professions propose decreasing degrees of control over the content of law degrees. (See A. Bradney and F. Cownie, ‘Working on the Chain Gang?’ (1996) 2 Contemporary Issues in Law 15<span class="diff_chg"> at</span> 24–6).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 J. MacFarlane<span class="diff_sub">, M. Jeeves,</span> and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 836.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 <span class="diff_add">M. Jeeves, </span>J. MacFarlane and A. Boon, ‘Education for Life or for Work?’ (1987) 137 New Law J. 835 at 836.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 T.H. Huxley, ‘Universities: Actual and Ideal’ in T.H. Huxley, Collected Essays: Volume III (1905) 215.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 J.S. Mill, ‘Inaugural address to the University of St Andrews’ in Collected Work of John Stuart Mill: Volume XXI, ed. J.M. Robson (1984) 218.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para. 9.32.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 id., para. 5.11.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 F.R. Leavis, Education and the University (1948) 28. Leavis’s view was narrowly nationalistic. For ‘centre’ it would be better to substitute ‘centres’.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 See, further, A. Bradney, ‘Liberalising Legal Education’ in The Law School: Global Issues, Local Questions, ed. F. Cownie (forthcoming).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__5"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich<span class="diff_sub">,</span> ‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks<span class="diff_sub">,</span> op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 P. Goodrich ‘Of Blackstone’s Tower: Metephors of Distance and Histories of the English Law School’ in Birks op. cit., n. 1, p. 59.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 S. Turow, One L (1977) 106.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 129.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 O. Kahn-Freund, ‘Reflections on Legal Education’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Rev. 121 at 129.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">25 Kahn-Freund believed ... legal argument (Kahn-Freund, id.).</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">25 Kahn-Freund believed that both doctrinal and non-doctrinal learning were possible together though he did concede that in the doctrinal method there was ‘the danger that the discussion gets stuck in the perhaps intellectually very fascinating game of legal argument.. .’ (Kahn-Freund, id.).</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Leavis, op. cit., n. 20, p. 120.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Leavis has, of course, been widely criticized for the cultural and gender assumptions that lie behind his selection of material to be studied. (See, for example, M. King, The New English Literatures (1980) at 216–17<span class="diff_add"> </span>.) Whatever the accuracy of these criticisms, they are criticisms of the application of the method rather than the method itself.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th <span class="diff_sub">ed</span>., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Jurisprudence by Sir John Salmond, ed. G. Willliams (10th ., 1947) at 256 and 257.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 So much so that when other disciplines engage with law they must develop their own concepts to analyse law rather than rely on the concepts already developed in law. See, for example, E. Durkheim The Division of Labour in Society (1933) 68.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The Quiet Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law (1994) 65. On the effect on women students, see ‘Define and Empower: Women Students Consider Feminist Learning’ (1990) I Law and Critique 47 at pp. 54–55. For a survey of CLS and feminist literature on this general point, see W. Conklin, ‘The Invisible Author of Legal Authority’ (1996) VII Law and Critique 173 at pp. 173–6.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 429.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 R. Collier, ‘Masculinism, Law and Law Teaching’ (1991) 19 International J. of the Sociology of Law 427 at 429.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 8.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 P. McAuslan, ‘Administrative Law, Collective Consumption and Judicial Policy’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Rev. 1 at 8.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Le Brun and Johnstone, op. cit, n. 32, pp. 71–5.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Goodrich, op. cit., n. 22.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 258.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 P. Samuelson, ‘The Convergence of the Law School and the University’ (1975) 44 The Am. Scholar 256 at 258.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 46.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 P. Harris and M. Jones ‘A Survey of Law Schools in the United Kingdom, 1996’ (1997) 31 The Law Teacher 38 at 46.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson<span class="diff_sub"> </span>, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 152.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 J. Wilson, ‘A third survey of university legal education’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies 143 at 152.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">42 Thus, for example, Harris and Jones reported that 59.2 per cent of all particpating institutions offered foriegn language tuition as part of their standard LLB programme. (Harris and Jones, op. cit., n. 40, at p. 54).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">43 P. Leighton, T. Mortimer, and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995) 34. This would include teaching both non-law degree students and sub-degree students.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">43 T. Mortimer, P. Leighton and N. Whatley, Law Teachers: Lawyers or Academics? (1995).</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 id., p 35</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 189.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 L. Skwarok, ‘Business Law for Non-Lawyers: Setting the Stage for Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Hong Kong Polytechnic University’ (1995) 29 The Law Teacher 189 at 189.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 13.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 N. Bastin, ‘Law, Law Staff and CNAA Business Studies Degree Courses’ (1985) 19 The Law Teacher 12 at 13.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 282.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 A. Ridley, ‘Legal Skills for Non-Law Students: Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?’ (1994) 28 The Law Teacher 281 at 282.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 G. Cartan and T. Vilkinas, ‘Legal Literacy for Managers: The Role of the Educator’ (1990) 24 The Law Teacher 246 at 248.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to9__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, at p. 284.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 This, of course, is not always the case. For example, the BA Economics and Law degree at Leicester has a special course in each year given over to the consideration of the relationship between economics and law.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 P. Birks, ‘Short Cuts’ in Pressing Problems in the Law, ed. P. Birks (1994) 10–24.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 Ridley, op. cit., n. 47, p. 283.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Cartan and Vilkinas, op. cit., n. 48, p. 248.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110<span class="diff_sub">,</span> at 112.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to9__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 P. Harris, ‘Curriculum Development in Legal Studies’ (1986) 20 The Law Teacher 110 at 112.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dearing, op. cit., n. 12, para 9.3.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from9_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to9_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 G. Steiner, Errata: An Examined Life (1997) 20.</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html
index a351d17e504302e197868b54deb7aa13be23ea2e..a58c7d609d27fe050a4eb2e6d1430ca99c41695b 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.diff.html
@@ -21,76 +21,76 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to62__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to10__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl-corrected\10.1515_zfrs-1980-0103.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über<span class="diff_sub"> </span>,Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine', 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über,<span class="diff_add"> </span>Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine<span class="diff_add"> </span>', 1976.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur 'Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel 'Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__2"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black 1973<span class="diff_sub">,</span> S. 125 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black<span class="diff_add">,</span> 1973 S. 125 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__5"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75<span class="diff_sub">,</span> der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75 der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S.<span class="diff_sub"> </span>82 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff. Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S.82 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg">'</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,<span class="diff_sub"> </span>% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärte<span class="diff_chg">i</span> 1976, S. 113-128.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärte<span class="diff_chg">l</span> 1976, S. 113-128.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">20</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">'</span>. (Blankenburg<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>. (Blankenburg<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff<span class="diff_sub">,</span> vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Fn. 17<span class="diff_sub">,</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89 Fn. 17</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__9"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Bender<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35 Bender<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff. sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">'</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">' </span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__12"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, unter Mitarbeit von Ralf Rogowski, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, unter Mitarbeit von Ralf<span class="diff_add">, Ralf</span> Rogowski, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__13"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome; Jan Howard und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome<span class="diff_add">-</span>; Jan Howard<span class="diff_add">-</span> und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75: Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/<span class="diff_add">19</span>75: Ever<span class="diff_add">y</span>day Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F.<span class="diff_add"> .</span>, 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__14"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to62__15"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rijn.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/Rijn.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to62__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. <span class="diff_add">Bd. </span>6. Opladen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from62_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to62_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__0">f</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Geiger 1964, insbesondere S. 65—83.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über<span class="diff_sub"> </span>,Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine', 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Vgl. Feest/Blankenburg, 1972. Die Konsequenz einer größeren Dunkelziffer bei den von der Polizei selbst entdeckten Straftaten entwickle ich ausführlicher in meinem Beitrag über,<span class="diff_add"> </span>Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine<span class="diff_add"> </span>', 1976.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur 'Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel 'Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Angaben aus einer Befragung von Peter MacNaughton-Smith und Richard Rosellen zur '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Bereitschaft zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>' Manuskript Max-Planck-Institut für Strafrecht, Freiburg 1978. Der ausführliche Forschungsbericht von Richard Rosellen erscheint in Kürze unter dem Titel '<span class="diff_add"> </span>Private Verbrechenskontrolle — eine empirische Untersuchung zur Anzeigeerstattung<span class="diff_add"> </span>', Berlin, voraussichtlich 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Vgl. Blankenburg/Sessar/Steffen, 1978, S. 66-85.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__2"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black 1973<span class="diff_sub">,</span> S. 125 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Black<span class="diff_add">,</span> 1973 S. 125 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Zur höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit der Normierung von Verhalten in weniger komplexen Beziehungen vgl. die Konflikttheorie von Gessner 1976, insbesondere S. 170—183.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">7 Zum Konzept der 'Thematisierung von Recht' vgl. Luhmann 1980, S. 99—112.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Ausführlicher bei Gessner 1976</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Vgl. Schönholz 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 64 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Hilden 1976, S. 64 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__5"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75<span class="diff_sub">,</span> der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Koch 1975, S. 75 der allerdings nur streitige Urteile und Vergleiche untersucht hat.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">13 Für Angaben der Zählkartenstatistik für die Familiengerichte siehe: Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Fachserie 10 (Rechtspflege) Reihe 2.1, Tabelle 10, Wiesbaden 1978.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Steinbach 1979 hat in einer Erhebung von 1144 Amtsgerichtsprozessen in der Bundesrepublik ohne Berlin in den Jahren 1974—1976 ein Verhältnis von 1 Räumungsklage je 1,2 Forderungsklagen, in Berlin allerdings von 1 Räumungsklage je 0,12 Forderungsklagen ermittelt. Im folgenden auch als GMD-Erhebung zitiert.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Johnson 1979 berichtet von dem erfolgreichen Versuch einer Unfall-Schadensregulierung ohne Berücksichtigung einer Schuldzuschreibung in Neuseeland (no fault accident compensation), S. 90 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S.<span class="diff_sub"> </span>82 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Steinbach 1979, S. 66 ff. Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S.82 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg">'</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,<span class="diff_sub"> </span>% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtshilfebedürfnisse sozial Schwacher<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>, (Blankenburg/Gorges/Reifner Ticmann). Befragt wurden im Januar bis März 1979 je eine Person in 835 Haushalten Westberlins. Veröffentlichung ist vorgesehen für Ende 1980. Quelle: Eigene Befragung in West-Berlin 1979, Zufallsauswahl aus allen Haushalten mit Deutschen. Mehrfachnennungen,% jeweils bezogen auf Personen, die im jeweiligen Bereich ein Problem nennen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärte<span class="diff_chg">i</span> 1976, S. 113-128.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Explizit bei Baumgärte<span class="diff_chg">l</span> 1976, S. 113-128.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">20</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">,</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">'</span>. (Blankenburg<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Projektbericht <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Rechtsschutzversicherung<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>. (Blankenburg<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Fiedler), Veröffentlichung voraussichtlich Mitte 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Vgl. auch Reifner/Gorges 1980.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 Reifner 1979.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Klassisch bei Carlin/Howard/Messinger 1967.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Grundsätzlich vgl. hierzu den klassischen Beitrag von Galanter 1974, S. 95—160. Die grösseren Chancen von Firmen, insbesondere bei der großen Zahl von vorstreitigen Erledigungen zeigt Sarat 1976, S. 339-375.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 138.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff<span class="diff_sub">,</span> vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Fn. 17<span class="diff_sub">,</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Steinbach 1979, S. 96 ff vgl. auch Blankenburg/Blankenburg/Morasch 1972, S. 89 Fn. 17</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 Reifner 1978.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 102 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Vgl. zum Verrechtlichungsbegriff meinen Beitrag über: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept 1980, S. 83—98.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__9"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Bender<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Steinbach 1979, S. 35 Bender<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Schumacher 1980, S. 24 und S. 49.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Wanner 1975, S. 293—306 hebt dies deutlich hervor, ebenso Bender/Schumacher 1980, S. 72 ff. sowie Galanter 1974; Sarat 1976.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">; </span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg/Schönholz<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rogowski 1979, S. 78 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Ebenda, S. 138-186.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Luhmann 1969.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">'</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">' </span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Für eine überaus positive Bewertung des <span class="diff_chg">‚</span>Vermeidens<span class="diff_chg">‘</span>vgl. Felstiner und Danzig/Lowy in Law and Society Review, vol. 9, 1974/75.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Baumgärtel, Gottfried, 1976: Gleicher Zugang zum Recht für alle. Köln.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bender, Rolf und Rolf Schumacher, 1980: Erfolgsbarrieren vor Gericht. Tübingen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Black, Donald, 1973: The Mobilization of Law, in: Journal of Legal Studies 2.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Blankenburg, Viola/Morasch, Helmut, 1972: Der lange Weg in die Berufung, in: Bender, Rolf (Hrsg.): Tatsachenforschung in der Justiz. Tübingen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1976: Nichtkriminalisierung als Struktur und Routine, in: Göppinger, Hans und Günter Kaiser: Kriminologie und Strafverfahren. Stuttgart.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard/Sessar, Klaus/Steffen, Wiebke, 1978: Die Staatsanwaltschaft im Prozeß strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__12"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, unter Mitarbeit von Ralf Rogowski, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard; Schönholz, Siegfried, unter Mitarbeit von Ralf<span class="diff_add">, Ralf</span> Rogowski, 1979: Zur Soziologie des Arbeitsgerichtsverfahrens. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Blankenburg, Erhard, 1980: Recht als gradualisiertes Konzept, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__13"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome; Jan Howard und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Carlin, Jerome<span class="diff_add">-</span>; Jan Howard<span class="diff_add">-</span> und Sheldon Messinger, 1967: Civil Justice and the Poor. New York.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/75: Everday Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Danzig, Richard/Lowy, Michael, 1974/<span class="diff_add">19</span>75: Ever<span class="diff_add">y</span>day Disputes and Mediation in the United States: A Reply to Professor Felstiner, Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 675—694.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Feest, Johannes/Blankenburg, Erhard, 1972: Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei. Düsseldorf.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F.<span class="diff_add"> .</span>, 1974/75: Influences of Social Organization on Dispute processing, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 63—94.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__14"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Felstiner, William L. F., 1974/75: Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 695-706.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Galanter, Marc, 1974: Why the ‚Haves‘Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 95—160.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Geiger, Theodor, 1964: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to10__15"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Gessner, Volkmar, 1976: Recht und Konflikt. Tübingen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Hilden, Hartmut, 1976: Rechtstatsachen im Räumungsstreit. Frankfurt/Main.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rijn.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Johnson, Earl, 1979; Thinking about Access: A Preliminary Typology of Possible Strategies. In: Cappelletti, Mauro und Bryant Garth (Hrsg.): Access to Justice, Bd. III. Milan und Alphen/Rijn.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Koch, Hartmut, 1975: Das Gerichtsverfahren als Konfliktlösungsprozeß — Einstellung von Klägern und Beklagten zu Mietprozessen. Diss. Hamburg.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1969: Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied und Darmstadt.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to10__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Luhmann, Niklas, 1980: Kommunikation über Recht in Interaktionssystemen, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. <span class="diff_add">Bd. </span>6. Opladen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1978: Rechtshilfebedürfnis und Verrechtlichung am Beispiel einer Berliner Mieterinitiative, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, IIM-dp/78—70.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo, 1979: Gewerkschaftlicher Rechtsschutz — Geschichte des freigewerkschaftlichen Rechtsschutzes und der Rechtsberatung der Deutschen Arbeitsfront von 1894—1945. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin IIM-dp/79—104.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Reifner, Udo und Irmela Gorges, 1980; Alternativen der Rechtsberatung: Dienstleistung, Fürsorge und kollektive Selbsthilfe, in: Blankenburg, Erhard; Klausa, Ekkehard und Hubert Rottleuthner (Hrsg.): Alternative Rechtsformen und Alternativen zum Recht, Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie Bd. 6. Opladen.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sarat, Austin, 1976: Alternatives in Dispute Processing in a Small Claim Court, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 10, pp. 339—375.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Schönholz, Siegfried, 1980: Arbeitsplatzsicherung oder Kompensation - Rechtliche Formen des Bestandsschutzes im Vergleich in: Vereinigung für Rechtssoziologie (Hrsg.): Arbeitslosigkeit und Recht. Baden-Baden.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Steinbach, E., 1979: GMD-Bericht, Manuskript. Gesellschaft für Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven bei Bonn.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from10_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to10_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Wanner, Craig, 1975: The Public Ordering of Private Cases; Winning Civil Court Cases, in: Law and Society Review, vol. 9, pp. 293-306.</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">
diff --git a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html
index b1588510cd7055beb1648035ce284e66949a00db..49da5f9a3b6083d5781c4e10d1832e13040c6fd4 100644
--- a/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html
+++ b/public/convert-anystyle-data/diffs-tei-bibl-corrected/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.diff.html
@@ -21,95 +21,90 @@
<body>
- <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to63__top"
+ <table class="diff" id="difflib_chg_to11__top"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" rules="groups" >
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
<colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup> <colgroup></colgroup>
-
+ <thead><tr><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">refs/10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.txt</th><th class="diff_next"><br /></th><th colspan="2" class="diff_header">tei-bibl-corrected\10.1515_zfrs-1980-0104.xml</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__0"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/ Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/ Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser, Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences (Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976) ; Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kötz I 12 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kötz I 12 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__1"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rehbinder.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Rehbinder.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff. Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.): Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai Petrella 3 (9 ff .) Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig Rehbinder 171 ff.</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. - Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Grimshaw 3 (18)<span class="diff_chg">. Auch der</span> Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Verba<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Viet<span class="diff_chg">/Almasy</span> 117 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Vallier 423 ff.<span class="diff_chg">; Almasy/</span>Balandier<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Grimshaw 3 (18)<span class="diff_chg"> Auch der</span> Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen, Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1. — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Verba<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Viet<span class="diff_chg"> Almasy</span> 117 ff. Vallier 423 ff.<span class="diff_chg"> Almasy </span>Balandier<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique <span class="diff_sub">(PUF, </span>Paris 1977) 137.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique Paris 1977) 137.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">13 Smelser 2 f. ; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.). - Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff .) Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423)</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. Vll 1 (2. Auf], 1969) 514 (520 ff<span class="diff_chg">.).</span> — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. Vll 1 (2. Auf], 1969) 514 (520 ff<span class="diff_chg"> .)</span> — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f. Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__5"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rebbinder 151 (159)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Rebbinder 151 (159)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rehbinder 56 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Rehbinder 56 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Rehbinder 178 (186 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240) Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15<span class="diff_sub">,</span> 25 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15 25 f.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979<span class="diff_sub"> </span>/1 S. 23 (31 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">. -</span> Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979/1 S. 23 (31 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.) Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —23) 5 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —<span class="diff_add"> </span>23) 5 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kötz I 30 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kötz I 30 f.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Smelser 182 f.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.) Smelser 182 f. Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Petrella 131 (157 f.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Petrella 131 (157 f<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185) Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Verba<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Viet<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Almasy 56 (80)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Verba<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Viet<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Almasy 56 (80)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Rehbinder 123 (134 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg"> , der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg">, der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data<span class="diff_add"> </span>". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff.<span class="diff_sub">,</span> 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff. 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979<span class="diff_add"> </span>— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg"> und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“<span class="diff_sub"> </span>wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff. Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg">und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kötz I 70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kötz I 70.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33<span class="diff_chg">, der auch die</span> skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -<span class="diff_add"> </span>8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33<span class="diff_chg"> der auch die</span> skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei<span class="diff_sub"> Oxford University Press,</span> London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kötz I 78.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kötz I 78.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33. Rechtsvergleicbung und vergleichende Recbtssoxiologie 79</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff. Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__13"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Smelser 167 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff. Smelser 167 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Petrella 95 (101)<span class="diff_sub"> ff.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Petrella 95 (101)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (<span class="diff_sub"> </span>oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Blazicek<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f.<span class="diff_sub">,</span> 242.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.; Blazicek<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f. 242.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__14"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Zander<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Schuyt<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Groenendijk<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.<span class="diff_sub"> Rechtsvergleichung und vergleichende Rechtssoziologie 81</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Zander<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff. Schuyt<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Groenendijk<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Siehe auch Ziegen<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.) — Siehe auch Ziegen Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology <span class="diff_sub"> </span>1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology 1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kaupen<span class="diff_chg">/</span>van Houtte/Vinke<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kaupen<span class="diff_chg"> </span>van Houtte/Vinke<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__15"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechts forschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son derheft 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechts forschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son derheft 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchungprivatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchungprivatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to63__16"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai<span class="diff_chg">/</span>Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff. Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai<span class="diff_chg"> </span>Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff<span class="diff_add"> </span>.)</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from63_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to63__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">Drobnig Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977);</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_79">79</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa rative Research Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968);</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_80">80</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">Rokkan Verba Viet Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_81">81</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">N. J Englewood Cliffs. 1976); Szalai Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977);</span></td></tr>
- <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header"></td><td nowrap="nowrap"></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to63_82">82</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__1"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa<span class="diff_chg"> rative Research</span> Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/<span class="diff_sub"> </span>Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences <span class="diff_sub">(</span>Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976)<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__1">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_1">1</td><td nowrap="nowrap">Abgekürzt werden zitiert: Armer/Grimshaw (Hrsg.), Comparative Social Research - Methodological Problems and Strategies (New York, London, Sydney, Tokio 1973); Drobnig/Rebbinder (Hrsg.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung (1977); Rokkan (Hrsg.), Compa<span class="diff_chg">rative Research</span> Across Cultures and Nations (Paris, Den Haag 1968); Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy (Hrsg.), Comparative Sutvey Analysis (Den Haag, Paris 1969); Smelser Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 1976); Szalai/Petrella (Hrsg.), Cross National Comparative Survey Research (Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Frank furt 1977); Vallier (Hrsg.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1971); Zweigert/Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Bd. I (1971).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__2"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_2">2</td><td nowrap="nowrap">1 Siehe näher Zweigert/Kötz I 12 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_3">3</td><td nowrap="nowrap">2 Rabel, Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung (1925), abgedruckt in: Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze III (Hrsg. Leser, 1967) 1 (3).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_4">4</td><td nowrap="nowrap">3 Siehe insbes. die Beiträge in Drobnig/Rehbinder.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__2">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_5">5</td><td nowrap="nowrap">4 Dazu R. Abel, Law Books and Books About Law, Stanford Law Rev. 26 (1973) 174 ff.; Benda-Beckmann, Einige Anmerkungen über die Beziehung zwischen Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 51 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_6">6</td><td nowrap="nowrap">5 Carbonnier, L’apport du droit compare ä la sociologie juridique, in: Livre du centenaire de la Societe de legislation comparee (Paris 1969) 75 (83).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__3">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_7">7</td><td nowrap="nowrap">6 Carbonnier (vorige N.) a.a.O.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.): Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff.</span></td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_8">8</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">7 Nowak, The Strategy of Cross-National Survey Research for the Development of Social Theory, in: Szalai/Petrella 3 (9 ff.) Rose, Interkulturelle Forschung in der Rechtssoziologie, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 171 ff..</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__3"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. <span class="diff_sub">- </span>Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_9">9</td><td nowrap="nowrap">8 Dazu näher Wirsing, Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs in der Ethnologie, Sociologus 25 (1975) 97 ff. Vgl. auch Poirier, Situation actuelle et Programme de travail de Techno logie juridique, Rev. int. Sc. Soc. 22 (1970) 509 (526).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_10">10</td><td nowrap="nowrap">9 Macaulay, Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract, Law & Soc. Rev. 11 (1977) 507 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_11">11</td><td nowrap="nowrap">10 Rose (oben N. 7) 175.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__4"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18). Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen<span class="diff_chg">,</span> Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_12">12</td><td nowrap="nowrap">11 Dazu Grimshau, Comparative Sociology - In What Ways Different From Other Sociologies?, in: Armer/Grimshaw 3 (18). Auch der Oberbegriff „cross System comparison" wird vorgeschlagen<span class="diff_chg">.</span> Tomasson, Introduction; Comparative Sociology — The State of the Art, in: Tomasson (Hrsg.), Comparative Studies in Sociology Vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn. 1978) 1 — Über die Methoden interkultureller und internationaler Vergleiche ist inzwischen so viel geschrieben worden, daß nicht nur die Fülle des Materials schon wieder abschreckend wirkt, sondern daß es auch genügt, im Rahmen dieses Aufsatzes nur einige wichtige Aspekte anzusprechen. Bibliographien finden sich etwa bei Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 117 ff.; Vallier 423 ff.; Almasy/Balandier/Delatte, Comparative Survey Analysis — An Annotated Bibliography 1967 — 1973 (Beverly Hills, London 1976) sowie bei Marsh, Comparative Sociology (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta 1967) 375 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_13">13</td><td nowrap="nowrap">12 Durkheim, Les règles de la methode sociologique (PUF, Paris 1977) 137.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_sub">13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.). - Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__4">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_14">14</td><td nowrap="nowrap"><span class="diff_add">13 Smelser 2 f.; Payne, Comparative Sociology — Some Problems of Theory and Method, Brit. J. Soc. 24 (1973) 13 (15 ff.) Ähnlich auch Eisenstadt, Social Institutions - Comparative Method, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Bd. 14 (London 1968) 421 (423).</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl<span class="diff_chg">,</span> 1969) 514 (520 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_15">15</td><td nowrap="nowrap">14 Boesch/Eckensberger, Methodische Probleme des interkulturellen Vergleichs, in: Graumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Bd. VII 1 (2. Aufl<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> 1969) 514 (520 ff.) — Zur „cultunit“, die vor allem durch die gemeinsame Sprache und die Zugehörigkeit zu einem Staat bzw. einer interpersonellen Kontaktgruppe gekennzeichnet ist, s. Naroll/Cohen (Hrsg.), A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology (New York, London 1973) sowie Smelser 168 f.; Wirsing (oben N. 8) 115.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_16">16</td><td nowrap="nowrap">15 Näher dazu Zelditch, Intelligible Comparisons, in: Vallier 267 (270 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__5"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__5">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_17">17</td><td nowrap="nowrap">16 Carbonnier (oben N. 5) 80.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_18">18</td><td nowrap="nowrap">17 Siehe Zweigert, Die soziologische Dimension der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rebbinder 151 (159).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_19">19</td><td nowrap="nowrap">18 Zu entsprechenden Versuchen etwa Merryman, Comparative Law and Scientific Explanation, in: Law in the United States of America in Social and Technological Revolution (Brüssel 1974) 81 (89 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_20">20</td><td nowrap="nowrap">19 Beispiel von Carbonnier, Sociologie juridique (Paris 1972) 188 N. 1.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_21">21</td><td nowrap="nowrap">20 Dazu Heidrich, Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung als Triebfehier sozialen Wandels, Jahr buch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 3 (1972) 305 (330 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__6">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_22">22</td><td nowrap="nowrap">21 Insbesondere Zweigert (oben N. 17) 157 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Straf<span class="diff_sub"> </span>rechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_23">23</td><td nowrap="nowrap">22 Kaiser, Strafrecht und vergleichende Kriminologie, in: Kaiser/Vogler (Hrsg.), Strafrecht, Strafrechtsvergleichung (1975) 79 ff. — Siehe auch Villmow/Albrecht, Die Vergleichung als Methode der Strafrechtswissenschaft und der Kriminologie, MschrKrim. 62 (1979) 163 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_24">24</td><td nowrap="nowrap">23 So etwa K. H. Neumayer, Ziele und Methoden der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Recueil des travaux suisses présentés au IXe Congrès international de droit compare (1976) 45 (48).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_25">25</td><td nowrap="nowrap">24 Zur Abgrenzung näher Rehbinder, Erkenntnistheoretisches zum Verhältnis von Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 56 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__6"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_26">26</td><td nowrap="nowrap">25 Näher dazu Merryman (oben N. 18) 101 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_27">27</td><td nowrap="nowrap">26 Heidrich, Sozialwissenschaftliche Aspekte der Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 178 (186 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_28">28</td><td nowrap="nowrap">27 Siehe etwa die Erklärung, warum das „Access to justice movement" in der Bundesrepublik vergleichsweise wenig Widerhall gefunden hat von Blankenburg, Patterns of Legal Culture as a Variable for the Chances of Legal Innovation, in: Blankenburg (Hrsg.), innovations in the Legal Services (Cambridge, Mass.; Meisenheim 1980).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_29">29</td><td nowrap="nowrap">28 So Rehbinder (oben N. 24) 60.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_30">30</td><td nowrap="nowrap">29 Dazu R. Abel, Comparative Law and Social Theory, Am. J. Comp. L. 26 (1978) 219 (224 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__7">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_31">31</td><td nowrap="nowrap">30 Dazu etwa Smelser 175 f. — Für die Kriminologie siehe Kaiser (oben N. 22) 89 sowie Blazicek/Janeksela, Some Comments on Comparative Methodologies in Criminal Justice, Int. J. Crim. Pen 6 (1978) 233 (240) Als besonders gefährlich hat sich die unkritische Übertragung solcher Konzepte auf Länder der Dritten Welt erwiesen. So kam man etwa zu dem Ergebnis: „The U. S. law and development movement was largely a parochial expression of the American legal style“, Merryman, Comparative Law and Social Change - On the Origins, Style, Decline and Revival of the Law and Development Movement, Am. J. Comp. L. 25 (1977) 457 (479).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_32">32</td><td nowrap="nowrap">31 Payne (oben N. 13) 15, 25 f.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__7"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979<span class="diff_sub"> </span>/1 S. 23 (31 ff.). <span class="diff_sub">- </span>Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_33">33</td><td nowrap="nowrap">32 Däubler, Systemvergleich im Arbeitsrecht? Vorüberlegungen zu einigen Methodenfragen, Demokratie und Recht 1979/1 S. 23 (31 ff.). Zum Vergleich mit den sozialistischen Ländern siehe auch Zweigert/Puttfarken, Zur Vergleichbarkeit analoger Rechtsinstitute in verschiede nen Gesellschaftsordnungen, in: Zweigert/Puttfarken (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung (1978) 395 (402 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —23) 5 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_34">34</td><td nowrap="nowrap">33 Blankenburg, Task Contingencies and National Administrative Culture as Determinants for Labour Market Administration (HM discussion papers 1978 —<span class="diff_add"> </span>23) 5 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_35">35</td><td nowrap="nowrap">34 Zweigert/Kötz I 30 f.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__8"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.); Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_36">36</td><td nowrap="nowrap">35 Dazu etwa Armer, Methodology Problems and Possibilities in Comparative Research, in: Armer/Grimsbaw 49 (50 ff.); Smelser 182 f.; Trommsdorf, Möglichkeiten und Probleme des Kulturvergleichs am Beispiel einer Agressionsstudie, KZfSS 30 (1978) 361 (364 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_37">37</td><td nowrap="nowrap">36 Wenn die Strenge elterlicher Strafen gemessen werden soll, kann man etwa darauf ausweichen, welche Strafe die Kinder am meisten fürchten, siehe Malewswka/Peyre, Juvenile Deliquency and Development, in: Szalai/Petrella 131 (157 f.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185)<span class="diff_sub">;</span> Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__8">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_38">38</td><td nowrap="nowrap">37 Näher Scheuch, The Cross-Cultural Use of Sample Surveys — Problems of Comparability, in: Rokkan 176 (185) Biervert, Der internationale Vergleich, in: van Koolwiyk/Wieken-Mayser (Hrsg.), Techniken empirischer Sozialforschung, Bd. 2 (1975) 113 (124 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__9"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_39">39</td><td nowrap="nowrap">38 Verba, The Uses of Survey Research in the Study of Comparative Politics — Issues and Strategies, in: Rokkan/Verba/Viet/Almasy 56 (80).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_40">40</td><td nowrap="nowrap">39 Gessner, Soziologische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der angewandten Rechtsvergleichung, in: Drobnig/Rehbinder 123 (134 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__9">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_41">41</td><td nowrap="nowrap">40 Nowak (oben N. 7) 42.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg"> , der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_42">42</td><td nowrap="nowrap">41 Für die Bedeutung der funktionalen Äquivalenz beruft man sich häufig auf Merton<span class="diff_chg">, der sie am</span> Beispiel der Religion näher erläutert hat (Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, London, erweiterte Aufl. 1968, S. 82 ff.): Eine gemeinsame Religion erfüllt im allgemeinen data<span class="diff_add"> </span>". OECD, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme - 1976 Progress Report on Phase II (Paris 1977) 40.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_43">43</td><td nowrap="nowrap">43 Rheinstein, Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law (Chicago 1972).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__10">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_44">44</td><td nowrap="nowrap">44 Abel (oben N. 4) 194 ff., 221 f. - Siehe auch Wilpert, Die Messung von Mitbestimmungsnormen — Darstellung eines international vergleichenden Forschungsansatzes (HM-Paper 1979<span class="diff_add"> </span>— 13) 2 ff. - Zur Behandlung der „Kultur" in vergleichenden Untersuchungen näher Scheuch (oben N. 37) 197 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__10"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_45">45</td><td nowrap="nowrap">45 Abel (oben N. 4) 207 ff. — Siehe auch Constantinesco, Ideologie als determinierendes Ele ment zur Bildung der Rechtskreise, Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 19 (1978) 161 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_46">46</td><td nowrap="nowrap">46 Siehe Blankenburg (oben N. 33) 3 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_47">47</td><td nowrap="nowrap">47 Rose (oben N. 7) 176.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg"> und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“<span class="diff_sub"> </span>wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_48">48</td><td nowrap="nowrap">48 Dazu etwa Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 55 ff.; Constantinesco, Über den Stil der „Stilthe orie" in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZvglRW 78 (1979) 154 ff. mwNachw. — Eine vergleichbare Debatte über „ähnliche“<span class="diff_chg">und</span> „unähnliche Gesellschaften“wird seit Dürkheim auch in der Soziologie geführt. Siehe Payne (oben N. 13) 16 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_49">49</td><td nowrap="nowrap">49 Siehe Zweigert/Kötz I 70.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__11">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_50">50</td><td nowrap="nowrap">50 Hofstede, Cultural Determinants of the Exercise of Power in a Hierarchy (Mimeographed, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management Working Paper 1977 -<span class="diff_add"> </span>8). Ebenso für das Arbeitsrecht Däubler (oben N. 32) 33, der auch die skandinavischen Länder in diese Gruppe aufnimmt.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_51">51</td><td nowrap="nowrap">51 Dazu Zweigert/Kötz 1 110 f. — Kritisch Benda-Beckmann (oben N. 4) 58 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__11"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_52">52</td><td nowrap="nowrap">52 IDE-International Research Group, Industrial Democracy in Europe (erscheint bei Oxford University Press, London 1980) Chapter VIII.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_53">53</td><td nowrap="nowrap">53 Zweigert/Kötz I 78.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_54">54</td><td nowrap="nowrap">54 IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter VIII.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__12"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_55">55</td><td nowrap="nowrap">55 Dafür Däubler (oben N. 32) 33.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_56">56</td><td nowrap="nowrap">56 Siehe dazu Rheinstein, Die Rechtshonoratioren und ihr Einfluß auf Charakter und Funk tion der Rechtsordnungen, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 1 ff.; Bernstein, Rechtsstile und Rechtshono ratioren. Ein Beitrag zur Methode der Rechtsvergleichung, RabelsZ 34 (1970) 443 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__13"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg">.,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__12">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_57">57</td><td nowrap="nowrap">57 Dazu etwa Ruescbemeyer, Lawyers and their Societies -- A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States (Cambridge, Mass. 1973); ders<span class="diff_chg"> .,</span> The Legal Profession in Comparative Perspective, in: H. M. Johnson, Social System and Legal Process (San Francisco, Washington, London 1978) 97 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_58">58</td><td nowrap="nowrap">58 Klausa, Politische Inhaltsanalyse von Rechtslehrertexten, ZfS 8 (1979) 362 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__14"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_59">59</td><td nowrap="nowrap">59 Siehe Nowak (oben N. 7) 23 ff.; Smelser 167 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101)<span class="diff_sub"> ff</span>.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__13">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_60">60</td><td nowrap="nowrap">60 Dazu näher Teune, Analysis and Interpretation in Cross-National Survey Research, in: Szalai/Petrella 95 (101).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_61">61</td><td nowrap="nowrap">61 Siehe dazu Nader/Todd, The Disputing Process — Law in Ten Societies (New York 1978).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (<span class="diff_sub"> </span>oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.<span class="diff_sub"> </span>; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__14">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_62">62</td><td nowrap="nowrap">62 Siehe zum entsprechenden Problem in der Kriminologie Kaiser (oben N. 22) 88 mwNachw.; Blazicek/Janeksela (oben N. 30) 235 f., 242.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_63">63</td><td nowrap="nowrap">63 Clinard, Comparative Crime Victimization Surveys — Some Problems and Results, Int. J. Crim, and Pen. 6 (1978) 221 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__15"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.<span class="diff_sub"> Rechtsvergleichung und vergleichende Rechtssoziologie 81</span></td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__15">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_64">64</td><td nowrap="nowrap">64 Siehe Abel-Smith/Zander/Brooke, Legal Problems and the Citizen (London 1973); Rokumoto, Legal Problems and the Use of Law in Tokio and London - A Preliminary Study in International Comparison, ZfS 7 (1978) 228 ff.; Schuyt/Groenendijk/Sloot, Rechtspro bleme oder private Schwierigkeiten — Die Inanspruchnahme von Rechtshilfe in den Nieder landen, in: Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie 5 (1978) 109 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.)<span class="diff_sub">.</span> — Siehe auch Ziegen<span class="diff_sub">,</span> Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_65">65</td><td nowrap="nowrap">65 Dazu Podgdrecki, Comparative Studies on the Attitudes Towards Various Legal Systems, Polish Sociological Bulletin 21 No. 1 (1970) 83 (88 ff.) — Siehe auch Ziegen Zur Effek tivität der Rechtssoziologie: die Rekonstruktion der Gesellschaft durch Recht (1975) 196 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology <span class="diff_sub"> </span>1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_66">66</td><td nowrap="nowrap">66 Siehe Podgdrecki, Legal Consciousness as a Research Problem, European Yearbook in Law and Sociology 1977 (Den Haag 1977) 85 (88 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_67">67</td><td nowrap="nowrap">67 Kutchinsky, „The Legal Consciousness“: A Survey of Research on Knowledge and Opinion about Law, in: Podgdrecki/Kaupen/van Houtte/Vinke/Kutchinsky, Knowledge and Opinion about Law (Bristol 1973) 101 (126).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_68">68</td><td nowrap="nowrap">68 Podgdrecki, Public Opinion on Law, in: Knowledge and Opinion about Law (vorige N.) 65 (84 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__16">n</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_69">69</td><td nowrap="nowrap">69 Heintz, Interkultureller Vergleich, in: König (Hrsg.), Handbuch der empirischen Sozialfor<span class="diff_add"> </span>schung, Bd. 4 (3. Aufl. 1974) 405 (414 f.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next" id="difflib_chg_to11__16"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son<span class="diff_chg"> derheft</span> 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_70">70</td><td nowrap="nowrap">70 Siehe Hegenbarth, Über methodische und organisatorische Grenzen der empirischen Rechtsforschung in Entwicklungsländern, Informationsbrief für Rechtssoziologie April 1979, Son<span class="diff_chg">derheft</span> 2, S. 5 ff. mwNachw.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_71">71</td><td nowrap="nowrap">71 Siehe etwa Gessner, Recht und Konflikt — Eine soziologische Untersuchung privatrechtlicher Konflikte in Mexiko (1976) 37 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_72">72</td><td nowrap="nowrap">72 Vgl. Heintz (oben N. 69) 407.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152).</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_73">73</td><td nowrap="nowrap">73 Da die theoretischen und technischen Erfordernisse solcher Vergleiche in der Tat komplex sind, bestand in der Kriminologie noch Mitte der sechziger Jahre internationale Überein stimmung, daß vergleichenden Studien kein Vorrang zu geben sei. Dazu Friday, Problems in Comparative Criminology, Int. J. Crim. 1 (1973) 151 (152).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_74">74</td><td nowrap="nowrap">74 Zur Anlage vergleichender Studien näher Rokkan, Vergleichende Sozialwissenschaft (1972) 9 ff.; Szalai, The Organization and Execution of Cross-National Survey Research Projects, in: Szalai/Petrella 49 ff. sowie IDE-International Research Group (oben N. 52) Chapter I.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.).</td><td class="diff_next"><a href="#difflib_chg_to11__top">t</a></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_75">75</td><td nowrap="nowrap">75 Siehe Blegvad, Methodological Aspects of the Project „Local Legal Systems<span class="diff_add"> </span>“, in: Kulcsár (Hrsg.), Sociology of Law and Legal Sciences (Budapest 1977) 97 (99 ff.).</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_76">76</td><td nowrap="nowrap">76 Dazu näher Zweigert, Die kritische Wertung in der Rechtsvergleichung, Festschrift für Schmitthoff (1973) 403 ff.<span class="diff_add">.</span></td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_77">77</td><td nowrap="nowrap">77 Siehe etwa zu vorliegenden französischen Untersuchungen Dörner, Rechtstatsachenforschung und Gesetzgebung — Hinweise zur Entwicklung einer Gesetzgebungssoziologie in Frank reich, Interview und Analyse 1979, 377 ff.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="from11_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td><td class="diff_next"></td><td class="diff_header" id="to11_78">78</td><td nowrap="nowrap">78 Siehe Bryde, Recht und Konflikt — Mexiko und Afrika, Verfassung und Recht in Obersee 12 (1979), 159 ff.</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="diff" summary="Legends">